Fonterra Australia Pty Ltd T/A Fonterra Australia

Case

[2020] FWCA 5959

6 NOVEMBER 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2020] FWCA 5959
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Fonterra Australia Pty Ltd T/A Fonterra Australia
(AG2020/3175)

FONTERRA SPREYTON AND WYNYARD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Tasmania

COMMISSIONER YILMAZ

MELBOURNE, 6 NOVEMBER 2020

Application for approval of the Fonterra Spreyton and Wynyard Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Fonterra Spreyton and Wynyard Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Fonterra Australia Pty Ltd T/A Fonterra Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in ss.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] I observe that clause 32 of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 4 (d) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[4] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 13 November 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 June 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE509468  PR724340>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0