FMF17 v Minister for Home Affairs

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FMF17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1906

Appeal from: Application for extension of time: FMF17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 1300
File number: NSD 975 of 2018
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2018
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal – where Federal Circuit Court dismissed a judicial review application of Immigration Assessment Authority decision – whether proposed appeal has any reasonable prospect of success – whether Immigration Assessment Authority considered all relevant information – whether Immigration Assessment Authority’s decision was unreasonable and irrational – where there was no error – application dismissed
Legislation:

Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 44.12

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 35.13 and 35.14

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H(1), 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa) and 36(2A)

Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397
Date of hearing: 13 November 2018
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 38
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr L Leerdam
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice

ORDERS

NSD 975 of 2018
BETWEEN:

FMF17

Applicant

AND:

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS

First Respondent

IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY

Second Respondent

JUDGE:

RANGIAH J

DATE OF ORDER:

30 NOVEMBER 2018

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

2.The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs of the application.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RANGIAH J:

  1. This is an application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia delivered on 22 May 2018. The application is brought under r 35.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).

  2. The Federal Circuit Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority (the Authority) pursuant to r 44.12(1)(a) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth). That rule provides that at a hearing of an application for an order to show cause, the Court may, if it is not satisfied that the application has raised an arguable case for the relief claimed, dismiss the application. Rule 44.12(2) states that, to avoid doubt, such a dismissal is interlocutory.

  3. Section 24(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) provides that an appeal shall not be brought from an interlocutory judgment of the Federal Circuit Court unless the Court or a judge gives leave to appeal. Under r 35.13 of the Federal Court Rules, an application for leave to appeal must be filed within…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read FMF17 v Minister for Home Affairs and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCA 1906
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant sought an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal a Federal Circuit Court decision which dismissed their judicial review application. The judicial review application concerned an Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) decision regarding the applicant's visa. The Minister for Home Affairs opposed the extension of time. The court had to determine whether the proposed appeal had any reasonable prospect of success, and if the IAA considered all relevant information and whether their decision was unreasonable and irrational.

The court found that the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospect of success. The court noted that the Federal Circuit Court had already considered and rejected the applicant's arguments in their dismissal of the judicial review application. The court also found that the IAA had considered all relevant information and that their decision was not unreasonable or irrational. The court found no error in the IAA's decision.

Accordingly, the application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal was dismissed. The court ordered that the applicant pay the Minister's costs of the application. This order was made pursuant to Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

2. The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs of the application.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.