FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FMF17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1906
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: FMF17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 1300 File number: NSD 975 of 2018 Judge: RANGIAH J Date of judgment: 30 November 2018 Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal – where Federal Circuit Court dismissed a judicial review application of Immigration Assessment Authority decision – whether proposed appeal has any reasonable prospect of success – whether Immigration Assessment Authority considered all relevant information – whether Immigration Assessment Authority’s decision was unreasonable and irrational – where there was no error – application dismissed Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 44.12
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A)
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 35.13 and 35.14
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H(1), 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa) and 36(2A)
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Date of hearing: 13 November 2018 Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 38 Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr L Leerdam Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice ORDERS
NSD 975 of 2018 BETWEEN: FMF17
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS
First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
RANGIAH J
DATE OF ORDER:
30 NOVEMBER 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2.The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs of the application.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
RANGIAH J:
This is an application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia delivered on 22 May 2018. The application is brought under r 35.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
The Federal Circuit Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority (the Authority) pursuant to r 44.12(1)(a) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth). That rule provides that at a hearing of an application for an order to show cause, the Court may, if it is not satisfied that the application has raised an arguable case for the relief claimed, dismiss the application. Rule 44.12(2) states that, to avoid doubt, such a dismissal is interlocutory.
Section 24(1A) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) provides that an appeal shall not be brought from an interlocutory judgment of the Federal Circuit Court unless the Court or a judge gives leave to appeal. Under r 35.13 of the Federal Court Rules, an application for leave to appeal must be filed within…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read FMF17 v Minister for Home Affairs and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] FCA 1906
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospect of success. The court noted that the Federal Circuit Court had already considered and rejected the applicant's arguments in their dismissal of the judicial review application. The court also found that the IAA had considered all relevant information and that their decision was not unreasonable or irrational. The court found no error in the IAA's decision.
Accordingly, the application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal was dismissed. The court ordered that the applicant pay the Minister's costs of the application. This order was made pursuant to Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs of the application.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.