Fletche v Racing Queensland Limited

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read
CITATION: Fletcher v Racing Queensland Limited [2012] QCAT 310
PARTIES: Mark Raymond Fletcher
(Applicant/Appellant)
v
Racing Queensland Limited
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: OCR041-12
MATTER TYPE: Occupational regulation matters
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: R F King-Scott, Member
DELIVERED ON: 20 July 2012
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: Disqualification for period of 3 years set aside and in lieu thereof the Tribunal directs the Applicant be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of 12 months.
CATCHWORDS:

Prejudicial or detrimental to the industry – cruelty whipping horse excessively – danger to the public by bolting horse

Australian Harness Racing Rules, Rule 243

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (QCAT Act).

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. On 5 January 2012, the applicant had attended the Parklands Paceway on the Gold Coast with a 2 year old colt named “Under the Gun”.  The applicant was part owner and trainer of the colt.  Although described as a race meeting, the purpose, as I understand it, of the event that day was an educational trial for young horses.  The applicant is a licensed trainer and driver.

  2. At about 6pm on that day, stewards received a complaint from Ms Rachel Beeton that she had observed the applicant approach a horse in the wash down area.  She said she did not see him hit the horse (because the horse was obscured from her vision) but she heard the horse being whipped.

The Charge

  1. Following that complaint, stewards investigated the incident.  After a hearing, the stewards charged the applicant with an offence under Rule 243 of the Australian Harness Racing Rules.  That rule provides:

    A person employed or participating in the Harness Racing industry should not behave in a way which is prejudicial or detrimental to the industry.

  2. Particulars of the charge laid by the stewards were:

    Mark Fletcher, a Racing Queensland Limited Harness Trainer Driver participating in the Harness Racing industry behaved in a way which was prejudicial and detrimental to the industry in that Mark Fletcher on 5 January 2012 inflicted an act of cruelty on an unraced two year old harness horse “Under the Gun” by striking the said horse with a harness whip with severe force on multiple occasions causing harm to the said horse resulting in it bolting into the stable compound placing persons present at risk.

The Hearing

  1. The hearing took place before a Stewards Panel on 12 January 2012, 17 January 2012 and 7 February 2012.  The following witnesses gave evidence at the hearing:

    a)     Dr Greg Baldwin, veterinary surgeon;

    b)     Mr Greg Alloway, eyewitness;

    c)     Mr Greg Barnard, eyewitness;

    d)     Mr Greg Evans, eyewitness;

    e)     Ms Rachel Beeton, eyewitness;

    f)      Mr Greg Hill, eyewitness.

  2. The Stewards Panel at the initial hearing also considered possible charges against a stable hand and co-owner of the horse, Mr Bradley Husband, but determined at a…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Fletche v Racing Queensland Limited and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] QCAT 310
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Fletche v Racing Queensland Limited involved the appellant, Fletche, challenging a decision made by the Tribunal to disqualify him from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of three years. The Tribunal’s decision was predicated on Fletche’s actions which were deemed to be detrimental to the industry and involved cruelty to a horse, as well as a risk to public safety through the excessive whipping of the horse, which resulted in it bolting. The matter was heard by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Appeal No 13 of 2012 [2013] QCAT 47, and subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court of Queensland.

The central legal issue that the court had to determine was whether the Tribunal's decision to disqualify Fletche for three years was appropriate, or if a lesser penalty, such as suspension, would be more suitable. The court needed to assess the severity of Fletche’s actions, considering both the cruelty towards the horse and the potential danger posed to the public. Additionally, the court had to evaluate the Tribunal’s discretion in imposing penalties and whether the Tribunal had exercised its powers in a manner that was just and reasonable.

The court found that while Fletche’s actions were indeed detrimental to the industry and involved cruelty, the Tribunal's decision to impose a three-year disqualification was excessive. The court noted that the Tribunal had the authority to set aside its initial decision and impose a different penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the three-year disqualification and ordered that Fletche be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of twelve months. The court upheld this decision, finding it to be a proportionate response to the circumstances of the case.

The final orders of the court were that the Tribunal's initial decision to disqualify Fletche for three years was set aside. In its place, the Tribunal directed that Fletche be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of twelve months. This decision balanced the need to protect the integrity of the industry with the principle of proportionality in the imposition of penalties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Disqualification for period of 3 years set aside and in lieu thereof the Tribunal directs the Applicant be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of 12 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.