| CITATION: | Fletcher v Racing Queensland Limited [2012] QCAT 310 |
| PARTIES: | Mark Raymond Fletcher (Applicant/Appellant) |
| v | |
| Racing Queensland Limited (Respondent) |
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | OCR041-12 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Occupational regulation matters |
| HEARING DATE: | On the papers |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | R F King-Scott, Member |
| DELIVERED ON: | 20 July 2012 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
| ORDERS MADE: | Disqualification for period of 3 years set aside and in lieu thereof the Tribunal directs the Applicant be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of 12 months. |
| CATCHWORDS: | Prejudicial or detrimental to the industry – cruelty whipping horse excessively – danger to the public by bolting horse Australian Harness Racing Rules, Rule 243 |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (QCAT Act).
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
On 5 January 2012, the applicant had attended the Parklands Paceway on the Gold Coast with a 2 year old colt named “Under the Gun”. The applicant was part owner and trainer of the colt. Although described as a race meeting, the purpose, as I understand it, of the event that day was an educational trial for young horses. The applicant is a licensed trainer and driver.
At about 6pm on that day, stewards received a complaint from Ms Rachel Beeton that she had observed the applicant approach a horse in the wash down area. She said she did not see him hit the horse (because the horse was obscured from her vision) but she heard the horse being whipped.
The Charge
Following that complaint, stewards investigated the incident. After a hearing, the stewards charged the applicant with an offence under Rule 243 of the Australian Harness Racing Rules. That rule provides:
A person employed or participating in the Harness Racing industry should not behave in a way which is prejudicial or detrimental to the industry.
Particulars of the charge laid by the stewards were:
Mark Fletcher, a Racing Queensland Limited Harness Trainer Driver participating in the Harness Racing industry behaved in a way which was prejudicial and detrimental to the industry in that Mark Fletcher on 5 January 2012 inflicted an act of cruelty on an unraced two year old harness horse “Under the Gun” by striking the said horse with a harness whip with severe force on multiple occasions causing harm to the said horse resulting in it bolting into the stable compound placing persons present at risk.
The Hearing
The hearing took place before a Stewards Panel on 12 January 2012, 17 January 2012 and 7 February 2012. The following witnesses gave evidence at the hearing:
a) Dr Greg Baldwin, veterinary surgeon;
b) Mr Greg Alloway, eyewitness;
c) Mr Greg Barnard, eyewitness;
d) Mr Greg Evans, eyewitness;
e) Ms Rachel Beeton, eyewitness;
f) Mr Greg Hill, eyewitness.
The Stewards Panel at the initial hearing also considered possible charges against a stable hand and co-owner of the horse, Mr Bradley Husband, but determined at a…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Fletche v Racing Queensland Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] QCAT 310
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue that the court had to determine was whether the Tribunal's decision to disqualify Fletche for three years was appropriate, or if a lesser penalty, such as suspension, would be more suitable. The court needed to assess the severity of Fletche’s actions, considering both the cruelty towards the horse and the potential danger posed to the public. Additionally, the court had to evaluate the Tribunal’s discretion in imposing penalties and whether the Tribunal had exercised its powers in a manner that was just and reasonable.
The court found that while Fletche’s actions were indeed detrimental to the industry and involved cruelty, the Tribunal's decision to impose a three-year disqualification was excessive. The court noted that the Tribunal had the authority to set aside its initial decision and impose a different penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the three-year disqualification and ordered that Fletche be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of twelve months. The court upheld this decision, finding it to be a proportionate response to the circumstances of the case.
The final orders of the court were that the Tribunal's initial decision to disqualify Fletche for three years was set aside. In its place, the Tribunal directed that Fletche be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of twelve months. This decision balanced the need to protect the integrity of the industry with the principle of proportionality in the imposition of penalties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Disqualification for period of 3 years set aside and in lieu thereof the Tribunal directs the Applicant be suspended from holding a Trainer and Driver’s licence for a period of 12 months.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.