Fleet v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of New South Wales
[2008] FCA 1905
•9 December 2008
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fleet v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of New South Wales [2008] FCA 1905
ROBERT FLEET v ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS NEW SOUTH WALES
NSD 86 of 2005
TAMBERLIN J
9 DECEMBER 2008
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 86 of 2005
BETWEEN: ROBERT FLEET
AppellantAND: ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS NEW SOUTH WALES
Respondent
JUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 DECEMBER 2008
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The appeal be dismissed.
2.The applicant to pay the respondent’s costs.
3.The respondent creditor’s costs of this appeal be treated as part of the costs as petitioning creditor for the purpose of section 109(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 86 of 2005
BETWEEN: ROBERT FLEET
AppellantAND: ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS NEW SOUTH WALES
Respondent
JUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE:
9 DECEMBER 2008
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
TAMBERLIN J
This is a notice of motion filed by Dr Fleet on 13 November 2008, seeking to set aside orders made by Justice Moore on 16 February 2005.
I am satisfied that Dr Fleet has failed to prosecute the proceeding with due diligence within the meaning of order 35A of the Federal Court Rules and accordingly I dismiss the notice of motion, that is to say, prayers number 1 through 5, in accordance with O 35A r 2(1)(f) of the Federal Court Rules.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin. Associate:
Dated: 9 December 2008
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms S. Nash
Date of Hearing: 9 December 2008 Date of Judgment: 9 December 2008
0
0
0