FJG17 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2018] FCCA 3314
•31 October 2018
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| FJG17 v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR | [2018] FCCA 3314 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Invalid proclamation of port – applicants not fast track applicants within Part 7AA – declarations made and writ issued. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 |
| Cases cited: DBB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 178 |
| Applicant: | FJG17 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS |
| Second Respondent: | IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY |
| File Number: | SYG 3798 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 31 October 2018 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 31 October 2018 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 31 October 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr P Bodisco |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Abu Legal |
| Counsel for the Respondents: | Mr H Bevan |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | DLA Piper |
ORDERS
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
The purported appointment of a port as a proclaimed port, an area of waters within the Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands, by notice published in the Commonwealth Gazette No GN 3 on 23 January 2002 is invalid.
The applicant is not an “unauthorised maritime arrival” within the meaning of s 5AA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
The applicant has not been notified pursuant to s 66 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) of the decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection dated 30 May 2017.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
A writ in the nature of certiorari is issued calling up the record of the second respondent and quashing the decision of the second respondent made on 22 November 2017.
The first respondent pay the applicant’s cost fixed in the amount of $7,328.00.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 3798 of 2017
| FJG17 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS |
First Respondent
| IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ and also declarations within the Court’s jurisdiction under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the Act”) in respect of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority (“the Authority”) under Part 7AA made on 22 November 2017.
On 13 September 2018, this Court made orders granting leave to the applicant to file a further amended application raising a ground of review based on the invalidity of the purported appointment of a port as a proclaimed port of an area of waters within the Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands and fixed the matter for hearing in the ordinary course today.
On the last occasion the counsel for the first respondent, Mr Bevan, consistent with the duties of a model litigant, conceded on behalf of the first respondent that the applicant in the present case could not be distinguished from the position identified in DBB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 178. It was accepted by the first respondent that the applicant was not a fast track applicant within the meaning of the legislation given the invalidity of the declaration of the port consistent with the decision in DBB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 178.
Counsel for the applicant, Mr Bodisco, has accordingly asked the Court for orders consistent with the declaration and orders that were made in DBB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 178. I am satisfied given the concession by the first respondent that the applicant is a person in respect of whom the invalidity of the notice published in the Commonwealth Gazette No. GN3 on 23 January 2002 means the applicant was not a fast track applicant and that, accordingly, the applicant is entitled to the declarations and orders sought in respect of the decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority in the present case made on 22 November 2017.
Accordingly, the Court makes declarations and orders.
I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Date: 23 November 2018
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
2