Legal Research
Cases
Fisher v Registrar of Titles

Fisher v Registrar of Titles

Case [2011] VCC 1420

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Fisher v Registrar of Titles [2011] VCC 1420
Case: [2011] VCC 1420
Decision Date: 2 December 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Fisher v Registrar of Titles [2011] VCC 1420

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Whittlesea City Council v Abbatangelo [2009] VSCA 188
Citation 1

…] The Court of Appeal set out relevant principles in detail by reference to earlier authority including: [7] (2009) 259 ALR 56; [2009] VSCA 188 and see Cervi v Letcher [2011] VSC 156, Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3 per Kiefel J, Kierford Ridge Pty Ltd v Ward [2005] VSC 215, Roy v Lagona [2010] VSC 150 (a) that a…
Water Corporation v Hughes [2009] WASC 152
Citation 2

…ted on 3 June 2011 to seek clarification of State Trustees’ position and to raise two further questions with the plaintiff. They were: [4] [2009] WASC 152 [5] cf Nolan v Nolan [2004] VSCA 109 (a) whether State Trustees, or its predecessors, were to be regarded as part of the Crown so that no title by adverse posse…
Nolan v Nolan [2004] VSCA 109
Citation 3

…ion of State Trustees’ position and to raise two further questions with the plaintiff. They were: [4] [2009] WASC 152 [5] cf Nolan v Nolan [2004] VSCA 109 (a) whether State Trustees, or its predecessors, were to be regarded as part of the Crown so that no title by adverse possession could be made against them: see…
Malter v Procopets [2000] VSCA 11
Citation 4

…is the subject of the adverse possession claim. The letter also sought confirmation that costs would not be sought against the Registrar. [2] [2000] VSCA 11 15 The proceeding returned to the Directions List on 2 December 2010, when I gave further directions and fixed the application for hearing on 4 February 2011…
Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3
Citation 5

…o earlier authority including: [7] (2009) 259 ALR 56; [2009] VSCA 188 and see Cervi v Letcher [2011] VSC 156, Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3 per Kiefel J, Kierford Ridge Pty Ltd v Ward [2005] VSC 215, Roy v Lagona [2010] VSC 150 (a) that a person who claims adverse possession must be shown to have both factual…
Cervi v Letcher [2011] VSC 156
Citation 6

…rinciples in detail by reference to earlier authority including: [7] (2009) 259 ALR 56; [2009] VSCA 188 and see Cervi v Letcher [2011] VSC 156, Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3 per Kiefel J, Kierford Ridge Pty Ltd v Ward [2005] VSC 215, Roy v Lagona [2010] VSC 150 (a) that a person who claims adverse possession mu…
NAB v New Road Holdings [2010] VSC 150
Citation 7

…etcher [2011] VSC 156, Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3 per Kiefel J, Kierford Ridge Pty Ltd v Ward [2005] VSC 215, Roy v Lagona [2010] VSC 150 (a) that a person who claims adverse possession must be shown to have both factual possession and the requisite intention to possess; (b) factual possession signifies an a…
Kierford Ridge Pty Ltd v Ward [2005] VSC 215
Citation 8

…9] VSCA 188 and see Cervi v Letcher [2011] VSC 156, Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3 per Kiefel J, Kierford Ridge Pty Ltd v Ward [2005] VSC 215, Roy v Lagona [2010] VSC 150 (a) that a person who claims adverse possession must be shown to have both factual possession and the requisite intention to possess; (b) fact…

AI Chat coming soon