[2016] FWC 551
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 | |
| s.394—Unfair dismissal | |
| Joshua Findley | |
| v | |
| Diamond Protection Pty Ltd T/A Diamond Protection | |
| (U2015/12391) | |
| COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 1 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for relief from unfair dismissal - minimum employment period served.
[1] The Applicant filed an application for an unfair dismissal remedy with the Fair Work
Commission on 21 October 2015. The Applicant alleged that he had been terminated at the
initiative of the employer on or about 19 October 2015.
[2] The Respondent denied that the Applicant had been dismissed and further objected to
the application on the grounds that Applicant’s employment period did not meet the minimum
employment period.
[3] The application was listed for a hearing on 16 December 2015 in relation to the
jurisdictional challenge that the Applicant had not been employed for the minimum
employment period.
The relevant legislation
[4] The relevant provisions of the Act for the purposes of the present matter are as
| follows: |
“382 When a person is protected from unfair dismissal A person is protected from unfair dismissal at a time if, at that time:
(a) the person is an employee who has completed a period of employment with his or her employer of at least the minimum employment period; and
(b) one or more of the following apply:
(i) a modern award covers the person; (ii) an enterprise agreement applies to the person in relation to the employment;
[2016] FWC 551
(iii) the sum of the person’s annual rate of earnings, and such other
amounts (if any) worked out in relation to the person in accordance with
the regulations, is less than the high income threshold.
383 Meaning of minimum employment period
The minimum employment period is:
(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the
earlier of the following times:
(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;
(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or
(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.
384 Period of employment
(1) An employee’s period of employment with an employer at a particular time is the period of continuous service the employee has completed with the employer at that
time as an employee.
(2) However:
(a) a period of service as a casual employee does not count towards the employee’s period of employment unless: (i) the employment as a casual employee was on a regular and
systematic basis; and
(ii) during the period of service as a casual employee, the employee had
a reasonable expectation of continuing employment by the employer on
a regular and systematic basis; …”
[5] As s.384 refers to the period of continuous service with the employer it is necessary to
have regard to the definition of continuous service in s.22 of the Act:
“22 Meanings of service and continuous service
General meaning
(1) A period of service by a national system employee with his or her national system employer is a period during which the employee is…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Findley v Diamond Protection Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] FWC 551
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.