Findlay & Anor and Punyawong

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FINDLAY AND ANOR & PUNYAWONG [2011] FamCA 503
FAMILY LAW - CHILDREN - overseas surrogacy arrangement - where the male applicant provided the sperm - where the applicants are resident in Queensland and the arrangement was illegal in that State - where Australia granted a visa for the children to live in Australia - whether it is appropriate to make a finding that the sperm donor was a parent - children to live with the applicants - the applicants to have equal shared parental responsibility of the children - referral of the judgment to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland for consideration of whether a prosecution should be instituted against the applicants under s 3 Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988 (Qld)

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988 (Qld)

Surrogacy Act 2010 (Qld)

Dudley and Anor &  Chedi [2011] FamCA 502
1st APPLICANT: Mr Findlay
2nd APPLICANT: Ms Adrei
RESPONDENT: Ms Punyawong
FILE NUMBER: SYC 1788 of 2011
DATE DELIVERED: 30 June 2011
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Watts J
HEARING DATE: 23 May 2011

REPRESENTATION

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Lewis Law

Orders

  1. The children W and M, both born … January 2011 (“the children”) live with the applicants, Mr Findlay and Ms Adrei.

  2. The applicants have equal shared parental responsibility for making decisions about long term issues and day to day issues in respect of the children.

  3. The Registrar provide a copy of this judgment to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland for consideration of whether a prosecution should be instituted against the applicants under s 3 Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988 (Qld) and, if requested, provide a copy of any document on the court file to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland.

It is noted that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Findlay and Anor & Punyawong is approved pursuant to s 121 (9) (g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

.

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYC 7188 of 2011

Mr Findlay and Ms Adrei

Applicants

And

Ms Punyawong  

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

  1. The twins, W and M were born by a surrogacy arrangement in Bangkok, Thailand in January 2011. This was overseen by a fertility centre in Bangkok. Mr Findlay, the first applicant, provided his sperm to be used in an artificial conception procedure with donated eggs. The anonymous egg donor is not a party to these proceedings. The surrogate mother, the respondent in these proceedings, was not the egg donor and was impregnated with the fertilised eggs. 

  2. The children’s birth mother consents to the applicants having orders made in their favour under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“FLA”) for parental responsibility and for the children to live with them at their home in Queensland.

  3. The surrogate mother placed the children into the sole care of the applicants almost immediately after their births.  The children shortly thereafter travelled to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Findlay & Anor and Punyawong and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] FamCA 503
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Findlay & Anor and Punyawong*, heard before Watts J, the dispute concerned the living arrangements and parental responsibility for two children, W and M, born in January 2011. The children resided with the applicants, Mr Findlay and Ms Adrei.

The court was required to determine the orders regarding the children's residence and the allocation of parental responsibility. Additionally, the court considered the implications of the applicants' actions in relation to the *Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988* (Qld).

Watts J made orders that the children live with the applicants, Mr Findlay and Ms Adrei, and that the applicants have equal shared parental responsibility for both long-term and day-to-day decisions concerning the children. Furthermore, the Registrar was directed to provide a copy of the judgment to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland, for consideration of potential prosecution under section 3 of the *Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988* (Qld), and to furnish any requested documents from the court file to that office.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The children W and M, both born … January 2011 (“the children”) live with the applicants, Mr Findlay and Ms Adrei.

2.

The applicants have equal shared parental responsibility for making decisions about long term issues and day to day issues in respect of the children.

3.

The Registrar provide a copy of this judgment to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland for consideration of whether a prosecution should be instituted against the applicants under s 3 Surrogate Parenthood Act 1988 (Qld) and, if requested, provide a copy of any document on the court file to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Queensland.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.