Field & Kingston

Case [2017] FamCA 208


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FIELD & KINGSTON [2017] FamCA 208
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Interim Proceedings – Where the wife seeks a certificate pursuant to Section 128 of the Evidence Act – Where there is insufficient evidence in support of the application – The wife’s application be dismissed.

Evidence Act 1995 Section s 128

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79

Aitken & Murphy [2011] FamCA 785
Atkinson & Atkinson (1997) FLC 92-728
Ferrall and McTaggart (trustees for Sapphire Trust) v Blyton (2000) FLC 93-054
Jarvis & Pike (2013) 50 Fam LR 593; [2013] FamCAFC 196

APPLICANT: Ms Field
RESPONDENT: Mr Kingston
FILE NUMBER: PAC 2095 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 7 April 2017
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Hannam J
HEARING DATE: 12 December 2016

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Gillies
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Matthews Folbigg
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Williams
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Barkus Doolan

Orders

  1. Order 1 sought by the wife in her Amended Application in a Case filed 4 November 2016 is dismissed.

  2. The balance of the application is adjourned to 2.15pm on 23 May 2017 before Registrar Murdoch for further directions.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Field & Kingston has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC 2095  of 2014

Ms Field

Applicant

And

Mr Kingston

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The Applicant wife, in proceedings with her former husband for a property settlement under s 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”), seeks a number of interim property orders. Only one of the orders sought was pressed at interim hearing on 12 December 2016.

  2. Accordingly, this judgment is concerned with the only order sought by the Applicant wife at interim hearing that a certificate be granted to her pursuant to Section 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) (‘the Evidence Act’) regarding evidence to be given as to her income and expenditure.

background

  1. The husband, who is 49, and the wife, who is 42, were married in 2002 and have three children who primarily live with the husband in the former matrimonial home.

  2. The parties separated on a final basis in January 2011 and were divorced in July 2014.

  3. The wife commenced property settlement proceedings by Initiating Application filed 4 May 2015.  The matter has progressed very little since the initiation of proceedings.

  4. It appears that the matrimonial property broadly consists of the former matrimonial home in Suburb B, a…

Continue reading Field & Kingston

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Field & Kingston [2017] FamCA 208
Case
[2017] FamCA 208
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Field & Kingston*, Hannam J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application by the wife. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the wife’s application.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the wife's application filed on 4 November 2016. The court was required to decide whether to grant the relief sought in that application.

Hannam J dismissed the specific order sought by the wife in her Amended Application in a Case. The remaining aspects of the wife's application were adjourned for further directions before Registrar Murdoch on 23 May 2017.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Order 1 sought by the wife in her Amended Application in a Case filed 4 November 2016 is dismissed.

2.

The balance of the application is adjourned to 2.15pm on 23 May 2017 before Registrar Murdoch for further directions.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.