| [2015] FWCA 4795 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ferristex Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3699)
FERRISTEX PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Textile industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 14 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Ferristex Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ferristex Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ferristex Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 14 July 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE414803 PR569423>
- AGLC
- Ferristex Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4795
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4795
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court needed to determine whether the proposed agreement adhered to the legislative requirements, including provisions on employee protections, procedural fairness, and the nature of the agreement itself. The union's objections focused on specific terms they believed did not meet the statutory standards, particularly concerning employee entitlements and procedural fairness. The court had to evaluate these objections to ascertain if the agreement was compliant and, if not, what modifications were necessary.
In its reasoning, the court examined each contested clause in detail, considering statutory provisions and relevant case law. The court found that some of the union's objections were valid, as certain clauses did not comply with the Fair Work Act 2009. After careful consideration, the court made amendments to these clauses to ensure they met the legislative requirements. The court then approved the agreement with these modifications, finding that the amended agreement complied with the Act and was fair and reasonable. The court's decision was grounded in a thorough analysis of the statutory provisions and the specific facts of the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.