FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ferrara & Ferrara [2021] FamCA 536
File number(s): SYC1747 of 2021 Judgment of: REES J Date of judgment: 27 July 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – INTERIM PROPERTY – Application by the wife for interim financial relief – Where the financial position of the parties is complex – Where the wife is unable to support herself – Where the husband contends the former matrimonial home must be sold to generate funds – Evidence of large sums being transferred between the husband and various corporate entities – Orders granting the wife interim relief. Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117 Cases cited: Salvage & Fosse (2020) 61 Fam LR 45; [2020] FamCAFC 144 Number of paragraphs: 104 Date of hearing: 22 July 2021 Place: Sydney Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Dura Solicitor for the Applicant: Capelin Law Pty Ltd Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Blank Solicitor for the Respondent: Sage Solicitors ORDERS
SYC 1747 of 2021 BETWEEN: MS FERRARA
Applicant
AND: MR FERRARA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
REES J
DATE OF ORDER:
27 JULY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS PENDING FURTHER ORDER:
1.That within 14 days of the date of this order the husband shall vacate the property at B Street, Suburb C in the state of New South Wales (“Suburb C”) and thereafter the wife shall be entitled to the sole occupation of that property.
2.That the husband shall pay, as they fall due, all mortgage payments, building and contents insurance premiums and rates relating to Suburb C.
3.That the husband pay to the wife by way of periodic spousal maintenance the sum of $1,320 per week, the first payment to be made forthwith and payments thereafter to be made weekly to the wife’s nominated bank account.
4.That within 28 days of the date of these orders, the husband pay to the wife, by way of lump sum spousal maintenance, the sum of $100,000.
5.That until such time as the husband has paid the sum of $100,000 in accordance with Order 4, the husband is restrained from dealing with the proceeds of sale of the vehicles described by him as Motor Vehicle 1 and Motor Vehicle 2, other than for the purpose of complying with that order.
6.That the wife do all things necessary to sell the unregistered Motor Vehicle 3 and to retain the proceeds of sale, provided that if the wife has not sold the vehicle within 14 days of the date of these orders, then the husband shall forthwith sell the vehicle and pay to the wife $22,000 or such greater sum as is paid for the vehicle.
7.That the husband’s application for the sale of Suburb C is dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant…
Continue reading Ferrara & Ferrara
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Ferrara & Ferrara [2021] FamCA 536
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 536
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate interim property and spousal maintenance orders, particularly in light of the wife's inability to support herself and the husband's assertions regarding the necessity of selling the matrimonial home. The court also had to consider the husband's dealings with corporate entities and the potential impact on the available assets.
Rees J reasoned that the wife required immediate financial support and sole occupation of the former matrimonial home pending further orders. The court applied principles of interim spousal maintenance and property adjustment, taking into account the parties' respective financial positions and the need to preserve assets. The husband's application for the sale of the matrimonial home was dismissed, with the court instead ordering the husband to pay mortgage, insurance, and rates for the property. The husband was also ordered to pay periodic and lump sum spousal maintenance, and was restrained from dealing with the proceeds of sale of certain vehicles until the lump sum was paid. The wife was permitted to sell a third vehicle, with provisions for the husband to sell it if she did not within a specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
SYC 1747 of 2021
BETWEEN:
MS FERRARA
Applicant
AND:
MR FERRARA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
REES J
DATE OF ORDER:
27 JULY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS PENDING FURTHER ORDER:
1. That within 14 days of the date of this order the husband shall vacate the property at B Street, Suburb C in the state of New South Wales (“Suburb C”) and thereafter the wife shall be entitled to the sole occupation of that property.
2. That the husband shall pay, as they fall due, all mortgage payments, building and contents insurance premiums and rates relating to Suburb C.
3. That the husband pay to the wife by way of periodic spousal maintenance the sum of $1,320 per week, the first payment to be made forthwith and payments thereafter to be made weekly to the wife’s nominated bank account.
4. That within 28 days of the date of these orders, the husband pay to the wife, by way of lump sum spousal maintenance, the sum of $100,000.
5. That until such time as the husband has paid the sum of $100,000 in accordance with Order 4, the husband is restrained from dealing with the proceeds of sale of the vehicles described by him as Motor Vehicle 1 and Motor Vehicle 2, other than for the purpose of complying with that order.
6. That the wife do all things necessary to sell the unregistered Motor Vehicle 3 and to retain the proceeds of sale, provided that if the wife has not sold the vehicle within 14 days of the date of these orders, then the husband shall forthwith sell the vehicle and pay to the wife $22,000 or such greater sum as is paid for the vehicle.
7. That the husband’s application for the sale of Suburb C is dismissed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.