Ferdinands v Registrar Burns (Vexatious Proceedings Order)
Case
•
[2024] FCAFC 157
•9 December 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ferdinands v Registrar Burns (Vexatious Proceedings Order) [2024] FCAFC 157
[2024] FCAFC 157
9 December 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter before the Federal Court involved an application by the Registrar Burns for a vexatious proceedings order against Mr Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands. Mr Ferdinands had been instituting numerous proceedings in Australian courts and tribunals over a prolonged period, largely concerning grievances stemming from events dating back to 1999. These events included his conviction for assault and subsequent demotion in the Defence Force, another assault conviction, and his dismissal from the South Australian Police Service. The core legal issue was whether the Court should exercise its discretion to make a vexatious proceedings order against Mr Ferdinands, which would restrict his ability to initiate proceedings without the Court’s leave.
The Court considered the cumulative conditions outlined in s 37AO(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976. These required the Court to determine if Mr Ferdinands had frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings in Australian courts or tribunals. The Court examined Mr Ferdinands’ extensive history of litigation, noting that he had been a party to at least 50 proceedings since September 2000. The Court also highlighted that his conduct often included scandalous allegations, further supporting the characterisation of his proceedings as vexatious. The Court concluded that the cumulative conditions were satisfied, leading to the determination that a vexatious proceedings order was warranted.
The Court found that Mr Ferdinands’ uninhibited access to the courts had been a significant drain on public resources, disrupted the efficient management of the Court’s operations, and brought the administration of justice into disrepute. Consequently, the Court exercised its discretion to make a vexatious proceedings order, prohibiting Mr Ferdinands from instituting proceedings without leave. This leave would only be granted if the Court was satisfied that the proceeding was not vexatious. The Court also ordered that copies of the orders and reasons be sent to Mr Ferdinands.
The Court considered the cumulative conditions outlined in s 37AO(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976. These required the Court to determine if Mr Ferdinands had frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings in Australian courts or tribunals. The Court examined Mr Ferdinands’ extensive history of litigation, noting that he had been a party to at least 50 proceedings since September 2000. The Court also highlighted that his conduct often included scandalous allegations, further supporting the characterisation of his proceedings as vexatious. The Court concluded that the cumulative conditions were satisfied, leading to the determination that a vexatious proceedings order was warranted.
The Court found that Mr Ferdinands’ uninhibited access to the courts had been a significant drain on public resources, disrupted the efficient management of the Court’s operations, and brought the administration of justice into disrepute. Consequently, the Court exercised its discretion to make a vexatious proceedings order, prohibiting Mr Ferdinands from instituting proceedings without leave. This leave would only be granted if the Court was satisfied that the proceeding was not vexatious. The Court also ordered that copies of the orders and reasons be sent to Mr Ferdinands.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Vexatious Proceedings
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Limitation Periods
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Ezekiel-Hart v Council of the Law Society of Act (Vexatious Proceedings Order) [2025] FCA 551
Cases Citing This Decision
8
In the Matter Of An Application By Trevor Kingsley Ferdinands For Leave To Issue Or File
[2025] HCASJ 12
Luck v Secretary, Services Australia (Vexatious Proceedings Order)
[2025] FCAFC 103
ZDTV v Administrative Review Tribunal
[2025] FCA 1150
Cases Cited
61
Statutory Material Cited
4
Ferdinands v Registrar Burns
[2024] FCAFC 105
Storry v Parkyn (Vexatious Proceedings Order)
[2024] FCAFC 100
Ramsey v Skyring
[1999] FCA 907