FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| FERANTI & CONNOR | [2008] FamCA 137 |
| FAMILY LAW – CONTRAVENTION – long running proceedings – father restrained from filing contravention application without Court’s permission where substantial compliance and father’s time or opportunity to communicate not significantly compromised – orders subject of appeal – father seeks leave to file contravention application – whether alleged contraventions fall within conditions imposed by order – allegation regarding telephone communication within condition of order – father granted leave to file contravention application. FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – father seeks judicial interview with child be conducted in place of family assessment report – not appropriate in circumstances – interests of justice require family report be prepared by qualified person – application dismissed. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT: | MS CONNOR |
| RESPONDENT: | MR FERANTI |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | NICOLA ATCHISON |
| FILE NUMBER: | MLF | 10368 | of | 1994 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 14 February 2008 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Adelaide |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Dawe J |
| HEARING DATE: | 14 February 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr P. Falconer |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Peter Falconer and Associates |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S COUNSEL: | Mr J.M. Bowler |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S SOLICITOR: | Ms N.L. Atchison |
Orders
Leave is given to the father to file a Contravention Application in relation to allegations of breach of orders concerning telephone communication which are alleged to have occurred on 28 November 2007; 12 December 2007; 30 January 2008; 6 February 2008 and 13 February 2008.
Paragraph 2 of the father’s Application in a Case filed on the 28 December 2007 is adjourned to 18 March 2008 at 9.30 am before the Honourable Justice Dawe.
Further consideration of paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the father’s Application in a Case filed on the 28 December 2007 is adjourned to a date to be advised after the receipt of the Family Assessment report.
Paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 of the father’s Application in a Case filed on the 28 December 2007 are dismissed.
The previously ordered Family Assessment be prepared as soon as possible.
The question of the father’s immediate payment of the share of the Family Assessment is adjourned to the date of 18 March 2008 at 9.30 am before the Honourable Justice Dawe.
AND IT IS FURTHER DIRECTED
The father to file and serve within seven [7] days a full Statement of Financial Circumstances providing all information concerning his financial circumstances so the question of the payment of the costs of the family assessment can be determined.
The Appeals Registrar provide copies of the Notice of Appeal to the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Feranti & Connor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FamCA 137
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the father should be granted leave to file his contravention application, given previous orders that restrained him from doing so without court permission unless substantial compliance was not achieved and his communication opportunities were significantly compromised. Additionally, the court needed to consider the father's applications regarding the Independent Children's Lawyer and the method of assessing the child's views.
Dawe J granted the father leave to file a contravention application concerning specific alleged breaches of telephone communication orders occurring between November 2007 and February 2008. The court reasoned that these alleged contraventions fell within the conditions previously imposed by the court for seeking leave. The father's applications to remove the Independent Children's Lawyer and to substitute a judicial interview for a family assessment report were dismissed, as the court found no grounds to support the allegations against the lawyer and considered a family report by a qualified person to be in the interests of justice. The court also adjourned further consideration of other aspects of the father's application pending the receipt of the family assessment report.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Leave is given to the father to file a Contravention Application in relation to allegations of breach of orders concerning telephone communication which are alleged to have occurred on 28 November 2007; 12 December 2007; 30 January 2008; 6 February 2008 and 13 February 2008.
2.
Paragraph 2 of the father’s Application in a Case filed on the 28 December 2007 is adjourned to 18 March 2008 at 9.30 am before the Honourable Justice Dawe.
3.
Further consideration of paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the father’s Application in a Case filed on the 28 December 2007 is adjourned to a date to be advised after the receipt of the Family Assessment report.
4.
Paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 of the father’s Application in a Case filed on the 28 December 2007 are dismissed.
5.
The previously ordered Family Assessment be prepared as soon as possible.
6.
The question of the father’s immediate payment of the share of the Family Assessment is adjourned to the date of 18 March 2008 at 9.30 am before the Honourable Justice Dawe.
AND IT IS FURTHER DIRECTED
7.
The father to file and serve within seven [7] days a full Statement of Financial Circumstances providing all information concerning his financial circumstances so the question of the payment of the costs of the family assessment can be determined.
8.
The Appeals Registrar provide copies of the Notice of Appeal to the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
9.
Leave is given to the father and the mother to attend by telephone link provided they notify the Court of the telephone numbers from which they can be reached at least forty-eight [48] hours prior to the adjourned date.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.