[2013] FWCA 6341 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Federal Express (Australia) Pty Ltd and Federal Express Corporation
(AG2013/7562)
FEDERAL EXPRESS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED AND FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION NATIONAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER CARGILL | SYDNEY, 4 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Federal Express (Australia) Pty Limited and Federal Express Corporation National Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Federal Express (Australia) Pty Limited and Federal Express Corporation National Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Federal Express (Australia) Pty Ltd and Federal Express Corporation (the applicants). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] In a decision dated 27 August 2013 [2013] FWC 6022 PR540601 I decided that I would approve the Agreement subject to certain undertakings. Those undertakings have now been provided by the applicants and are attached to the Agreement. Pursuant to section 190(4) of the Act I sought the views of each of the known bargaining representatives. I have considered the views of those representatives.
[3] I am satisfied the undertakings meet any concern I have in relation to the Agreement. In accepting the undertakings I have also accepted they are not likely to either cause financial detriment to an employee or result in substantial changes to the Agreement (s.190(3)). I note that under s.191 of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia and the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) each has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers both the organisations.
[6] In a letter dated 3 September 2013 the ASU raises questions which it wants clarified by the applicants. The ASU states that, notwithstanding its questions, the Agreement can be approved.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 11 September 2013. The nominal expiry date is 4 August 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403576 PR540993>
- AGLC
- Federal Express (Australia) Pty Ltd and Federal Express Corporation [2013] FWCA 6341
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6341
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically whether it provided for fair and efficient workplace relations, and if it adequately addressed the minimum entitlements of the employees. The court also considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for the fair resolution of workplace disputes.
In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met the criteria for approval. The court noted that the agreement provided for fair and efficient workplace relationships, with clear provisions for dispute resolution and minimum entitlements. The commission concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and provided for a fair and efficient workplace relationship. As a result, the application for approval was granted, and the agreement was approved as a national enterprise agreement. The final orders of the commission were that the agreement be approved and registered as a national enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.