Faulder v Tran
Case
•
[2018] ACAT 80
•21 August 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Faulder v Tran [2018] ACAT 80
[2018] ACAT 80
21 August 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Faulder v Tran was heard before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The dispute involved a tenant, the Appellant, who was appealing against a decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) concerning a claim for compensation for damage to the rental property caused by the tenant's former partner. The Tribunal was required to determine the appropriate compensation for specific items of damage and inconvenience.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were the quantification of damages and the proper allocation of costs. The Tribunal had to consider the evidence presented regarding the costs of repairing or replacing the damaged items and the reasonableness of the general inconvenience compensation. Additionally, the Tribunal needed to address the issue of the allocation of costs between the parties, including the costs of the original VCAT proceeding and the appeal before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal found that the Appellant was entitled to compensation for certain items of damage and inconvenience. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal dated 9 January 2018. The Tribunal determined that the Respondent should pay the Appellant a total of $1,692.50, broken down into specific categories including cleaning, broken blinds, an alarm system, a security key, a ducted vacuum system, a heating system, general inconvenience, and the costs of the original and appeal filing fees. This decision was based on the evidence provided and the Tribunal's assessment of the reasonableness of the claimed amounts.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were the quantification of damages and the proper allocation of costs. The Tribunal had to consider the evidence presented regarding the costs of repairing or replacing the damaged items and the reasonableness of the general inconvenience compensation. Additionally, the Tribunal needed to address the issue of the allocation of costs between the parties, including the costs of the original VCAT proceeding and the appeal before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal found that the Appellant was entitled to compensation for certain items of damage and inconvenience. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal dated 9 January 2018. The Tribunal determined that the Respondent should pay the Appellant a total of $1,692.50, broken down into specific categories including cleaning, broken blinds, an alarm system, a security key, a ducted vacuum system, a heating system, general inconvenience, and the costs of the original and appeal filing fees. This decision was based on the evidence provided and the Tribunal's assessment of the reasonableness of the claimed amounts.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Faulder v Tran [2018] ACAT 80
Most Recent Citation
Miskin v Munjal & Anor (Residential Tenancies) [2024] ACAT 1
Cases Citing This Decision
34
Bhara & Anor v De Costa & Anor (Residential Tenancies)
[2024] ACAT 62
Taylor Hembling & Sarah Thomson v Liwei Xu; Liwei Xu v Sarah Thomson & Taylor Hembling (Residential Tenancies)
[2024] ACAT 33
Miskin v Munjal & Anor (Residential Tenancies)
[2024] ACAT 1
Cases Cited
18
Statutory Material Cited
0
Australian Postal Corporation v Hughes
[2009] FCA 1057
Bangura & Fan
[2013] ACAT 38