Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Farzad Ebrahimzadeh v Lane Cove Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1350 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 26 and 27 June 2017 Date of orders: 04 July 2017 Decision date: 04 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Farzad Ebrahimzadeh (Applicant)
Lane Cove Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms J Reid (Applicant)
Dr J Smith (Respondent)
Mr G Hartley, Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
Ms J Corrandini-Bird, Marsdens Law Group
(Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/54637 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA 150/2016 for the demolition of existing structures, removal of one tree and construction of an attached dual occupancy at 59 Osborne Road, Lane Cove, subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.
………………………………
Commissioner Jenny Smithson
54637.17 Smithson (C) (266 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Farzad Ebrahimzadeh v Lane Cove Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1350
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1350
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the proposed construction complied with the Lane Cove Local Environment Plan, which sets out zoning and development standards. Ebrahimzadeh argued that the Council's decision was unreasonable and not in accordance with the law. He contended that his proposal adhered to the permitted development criteria for the zone in which his property was situated. The Council, on the other hand, maintained that the proposed construction would contravene local planning regulations, particularly those concerning setbacks and height restrictions.
In evaluating the case, the court considered the evidence presented by both parties, including expert testimony and planning documents. The court found that the proposed construction did not comply with several key aspects of the local planning regulations, including setbacks and height restrictions. The court concluded that the Council's decision to refuse the building permit was lawful and not unreasonable. The court held that Ebrahimzadeh's proposal did not align with the requirements of the Lane Cove Local Environment Plan, thereby justifying the Council's actions.
The court's final order was that Ebrahimzadeh's appeal be dismissed, and the Council's decision to refuse the building permit was upheld. The court found no grounds to interfere with the Council's decision, affirming that it was made in accordance with the law and the applicable planning regulations.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.