Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd t/as Falls Creek Coach Service

Case [2015] FWCA 4150


[2015] FWCA 4150
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd t/as Falls Creek Coach Service
(AG2015/2916)

FALLS CREEK COACH SERVICE PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 22 JUNE 2015

Application for approval of the Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Falls Creek Coach Service Pty t/as Falls Creek Coach Service (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with two nominated Employee Bargaining Representatives (EBRs) and is to cover 10 employees who are employed as Bus Drivers and Ticket Sellers/Reservation Staff based in Tawonga South, Victoria. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 27 October 2014, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place between 21 and 26 May 2015. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secret ballot, all 8 of the employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 4 June 2015, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr H Fallon, General Manager, identified the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 [MA000063] and the Transport Workers (Passenger Vehicles) Award 2002 [AP818060] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Fallon said that the Agreement does provide for some terms and conditions that are less beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including reduced casual loadings for some employees and less generous overtime entitlements. However, the Agreement provides for higher rates of pay and a series of continuous service grants. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 24 and 25 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 10 provides for conciliation, mediation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 17 June 2015, Mr R Lambert,appeared with Mr H Fallon for the applicant and Ms J Holden appeared in her capacity as a nominated EBR. Mr Lambert outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that wage rates are to be adjusted on 1 January and 1 July during the nominal term of the Agreement by reference to percentage changes between average weekly earnings in the preceding May to November and November to May, respectively. Ms Holden supported the submissions of Mr Lambert and indicated that she was happy with the Agreement.

[5] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 24 June 2015 and have a nominal expiry date of 30 March 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE414397  PR568530>

Details
AGLC
Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd t/as Falls Creek Coach Service [2015] FWCA 4150
Case
[2015] FWCA 4150
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application for approval of the Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015. Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd, trading as Falls Creek Coach Service, sought approval of the agreement under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary issue was whether the agreement met the criteria for being a "better off overall" agreement, as mandated by the Fair Work Act. The application was brought in the context of negotiations between Falls Creek Coach Service and its employees represented by a union.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, if it ensured a fair balance of benefits and obligations, and if the agreement provided employees with protections equivalent to or better than those provided by the relevant national workplace determinations. The Commission also needed to consider if the agreement was free from any coercion, duress, or undue influence.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met the criteria for being a "better off overall" agreement. The Commission determined that the agreement provided employees with terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable, ensuring a fair balance of benefits and obligations. The agreement also provided protections that were equivalent to, or better than, those provided by the relevant national workplace determinations. The Commission concluded that the agreement was not the result of any coercion, duress, or undue influence. Consequently, the Commission approved the Falls Creek Coach Service Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015, as it met the necessary legislative requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.