| [2023] FWCA 966 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd T/A Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd
(AG2023/644)
CFMMEU / FALCK VICTORIA HAZELWOOD MINE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022
| Fire fighting services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 3 APRIL 2023 |
Application for approval of the CFMMEU / Falck Victoria Hazelwood Mine Enterprise Agreement 2022
An application has been made by Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd (Employer) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for the approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the CFMMEU / Falck Victoria Hazelwood Mine Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement).
Question 20 of the Form F17 and an email attached to the Form F17 indicate that employees were notified of the vote on 22 February 2023 and question 25 of the Form F17 provides that the vote commenced the same day. This is less than the 7 clear days’ notice required by s 180(2) of the Act.
The Employer provided submissions on 30 March 2023 that employees were initially provided with the Agreement on 8 February 2022 in an email that indicated voting was to commence immediately. The voting was ceased and recommenced on 22 February and employees had in excess of 7 days to consider the Agreement. The Employer acknowledges the process did not meet the requirements of s 180(2) of the Act, however, submit that this concern can be remedied by s 188(2) of the Act. The Employer notes that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) and its delegates were heavily involved in bargaining and communication with employees about the terms of the Agreement. Further, the Agreement is largely a 'rollover' of the current enterprise agreement which covers the relevant employees. The Employer therefore submits that the Agreement was genuinely agreed on the basis set out in section 188(2) of the Act and in turn that section 186(2)(a) has been satisfied.
In the circumstances and having regard to the submissions of the Employer and the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others,[1] I am satisfied that the error constitutes a minor procedural error for the purpose of s.188(2)(a). Further, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to be disadvantaged by the error.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The CFMMEU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 April 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
[1] [2019] FWCFB 318
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519634 PR760804>
- AGLC
- Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd T/A Falck (Victoria) Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 966
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 966
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to decide were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, if it was free from any improper influences, and if it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the agreement met the "better off overall test" and ensured that it did not undermine the safety and health provisions of the Mine Health and Safety Act 2004.
The Fair Work Commission considered the submissions from both parties, examined the negotiation process, and reviewed the terms of the proposed agreement. The Commission found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and was free from any improper influences. It concluded that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements and passed the "better off overall test". Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement did not undermine the safety and health provisions of the Mine Health and Safety Act 2004. Based on this, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the CFMMEU / Falck Victoria Hazelwood Mine Enterprise Agreement 2022, and it became legally binding from the date of approval. This decision resolved the dispute between the applicant and the union, providing a framework for the terms and conditions of employment at the Hazelwood Mine.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.