Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited t/a Fairway Bayside Aged Care

Case [2020] FWCA 3156


[2020] FWCA 3156
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited t/a Fairway Bayside Aged Care
(AG2020/1362)

FAIRWAY BAYSIDE AGED CARE LIMITED (TRADING AS FAIRWAY BAYSIDE AGED CARE), ANMF AND HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Aged care industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI

MELBOURNE, 17 JUNE 2020

Application for approval of the Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited (trading as Fairway Bayside Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] Fairway Bayside Aged Care has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited (trading as Fairway Bayside Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).

[2] Since the application was made, the Commission raised concerns about the form of the application and whether the pre-approval requirements were met, the Agreement contravenes s.55 of the Act and passes the better off overall test. Further information was provided in relation to these concerns.

[3] Fairway Bayside Aged Care sought to correct a typographical error in the original application. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that this amendment should be allowed and that it is appropriate to do so pursuant to s.586 of the Act.

[4] Noting clause 6.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] Written undertakings were given in accordance with s.190 of the Act and are attached at Annexure A (Undertakings). The bargaining representatives supported the Undertakings. I am satisfied that the Undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the Undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

[6] On the basis of the material contained in the amended application, further information provided on request of the Commission and the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[7] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (Victorian Branch) and the Health Services Union Victorian No.1 Branch T/A Health Workers Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have respectively given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[8] The Agreement was approved on 17 June 2020 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 June 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE508299 PR720247>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited t/a Fairway Bayside Aged Care [2020] FWCA 3156
Case
[2020] FWCA 3156
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited, trading as Fairway Bayside Aged Care, applied for approval of their Enterprise Agreement 2020 with the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) and the Health Services Union (HSU). The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The primary dispute centred around whether the agreement met the necessary statutory requirements for approval, including whether it provided for the protection of employees' conditions and whether it was appropriately negotiated.

The court had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated, if it contained all the required minimum terms, and if it was fair and reasonable in terms of the conditions it provided. The specific issues included whether the agreement adequately covered the rates of pay, classification of employees, and other employment conditions. The court also needed to consider if the agreement provided for a fair process for resolving disputes and if it met the standards of procedural fairness.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did meet the statutory requirements for approval. It concluded that the agreement was genuinely negotiated, contained all the necessary minimum terms, and provided for fair and reasonable conditions for employees. The court held that the agreement appropriately covered the rates of pay and classification of employees and provided for a fair process for resolving disputes. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the standards of procedural fairness and was in the best interests of the employees.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Fairway Bayside Aged Care Limited (trading as Fairway Bayside Aged Care), ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2020. The approval ensures that the agreement will be legally binding on the parties involved and will provide a framework for the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.