Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fairfield City Council v Michael Patrick Keogh [2013] NSWLEC 90 Hearing dates: 11 April and 20 June 2013 Decision date: 20 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pepper J Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) that within a period of forty (40) days from the date of this order, the respondent place and keep the premises at 8 Barkley Street, Carramar, NSW, in a healthy condition by cutting and/or slashing and removing the overgrown vegetation (grass) from the premises;
(2) an order that if the respondent does not comply with order 1 within the time referred to in that order, then pursuant to s 678(1) of the Local Government Act 1993 that the applicant enter the land and do all such things as are necessary or convenient to give effect to the terms of the order, including the carrying out of any work required by the order;
(3) an order that the applicant give the respondent seven (7) days written notice of any time that the applicant intends to enter the land and give effect to the terms of order 2; and
(4) an order that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.
Catchwords: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT: non-compliance with orders by council to cut and remove overgrown grass - whether order breached - whether appropriate to order compliance with order - whether appropriate to make further order for council to carry out the work required in the event of non-compliance by the respondent. Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1993, ss 124, 132, 627, 672, 678 Cases Cited: Council of the City of Sydney v The Estate of the Late Alfred Sulligoi care of The Public Trustee [2007] NSWLEC 778
Manly Council v Moffit [2006] NSWLEC 184; (2006) 146 LGERA 215
North Sydney Council v Wouters [2012] NSWLEC 94
Waverley Council v Bobolas (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 211Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fairfield City Council (Applicant)
Michael Patrick Keogh (Respondent)Representation: Mr J Thompson (Solicitor) (Applicant)
N/A (Respondent)
Ritchie & Castellan Solicitors (Applicant)
N/A (Respondent)
File Number(s): 40072 of 2013
Judgment
Mr Keogh Fails to Comply with an Order Issued by the Council to Cut and Remove Overgrown Grass On His Property
By summons filed 1 February 2013, the applicant, Fairfield City Council ("the council"), seeks to enforce the terms of an Order 21 dated 2 October 2012, issued under s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 ("the LGA") ("the Order"). The Order was to, in effect, cut and remove overgrown grass on the property of the respondent.
The respondent, Mr Michael Keogh, is the registered proprietor of Lot 6 DP 13649, namely, 8 Barkley Street, Carramar, New South Wales 2163 ("the property").
On 3 August 2012, pursuant to s 132 of the LGA, the council served a Notice of Proposed Order on Mr Keogh to cut and remove the overgrown grass on his property. He did not reply to the Notice.
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Fairfield City Council v Michael Patrick Keogh and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] NSWLEC 90
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Court had to determine were whether the overgrown vegetation on Keogh's property constituted a health hazard and whether the Council was justified in seeking court intervention to compel Keogh to address the issue. The Court also had to consider the appropriate remedy, including whether the Council could enter Keogh's property to carry out the necessary work if Keogh failed to comply with the Court's order.
The Court found that the overgrown vegetation on Keogh's property constituted a health hazard, as it could attract vermin and provide a breeding ground for pests, posing a risk to the health and safety of the community. The Court held that the Council was justified in seeking court intervention to compel Keogh to maintain the property in a healthy condition. The Court issued an order requiring Keogh to remove the overgrown vegetation within forty days. If Keogh failed to comply, the Court authorised the Council to enter the property and carry out the necessary work. The Court also required the Council to provide Keogh with seven days' written notice before entering the property. The Court ordered Keogh to pay the Council's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) that within a period of forty (40) days from the date of this order, the respondent place and keep the premises at 8 Barkley Street, Carramar, NSW, in a healthy condition by cutting and/or slashing and removing the overgrown vegetation (grass) from the premises;
(2) an order that if the respondent does not comply with order 1 within the time referred to in that order, then pursuant to s 678(1) of the Local Government Act 1993 that the applicant enter the land and do all such things as are necessary or convenient to give effect to the terms of the order, including the carrying out of any work required by the order;
(3) an order that the applicant give the respondent seven (7) days written notice of any time that the applicant intends to enter the land and give effect to the terms of order 2; and
(4) an order that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.