Fair Work Ombudsman v Her Fashion Box Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 425
•28 February 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fair Work Ombudsman v Her Fashion Box Pty Ltd [2019] FCCA 425
[2019] FCCA 425
28 February 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia against Her Fashion Box Pty Ltd and its directors, Ms. Nadia Bartolo and Ms. Tina Bartolo, alleging contraventions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth). The dispute concerned the alleged failure by Her Fashion Box Pty Ltd to pay minimum wages and entitlements to employees, and the alleged involvement of the directors in these contraventions.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the assessment of appropriate pecuniary penalties for the admitted contraventions of the civil remedy provisions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth). This involved determining the quantum of penalties that would adequately reflect the seriousness of the contraventions, deter future misconduct by the company and its directors, and achieve the objects of the Act.
In determining the penalties, Judge Manousaridis considered a range of factors, including the nature and extent of the contraventions, the period over which they occurred, the number of employees affected, the financial position of the employer, and the need for deterrence. The Court applied established principles for the assessment of penalties under the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth), emphasising that penalties should be proportionate to the offending conduct and serve to uphold workplace standards. The Court also considered the level of responsibility and culpability of the directors in the contraventions. The Court ordered Her Fashion Box Pty Ltd to pay penalties totalling $108,000, and Ms. Nadia Bartolo and Ms. Tina Bartolo were each ordered to pay penalties of $18,000.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the assessment of appropriate pecuniary penalties for the admitted contraventions of the civil remedy provisions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth). This involved determining the quantum of penalties that would adequately reflect the seriousness of the contraventions, deter future misconduct by the company and its directors, and achieve the objects of the Act.
In determining the penalties, Judge Manousaridis considered a range of factors, including the nature and extent of the contraventions, the period over which they occurred, the number of employees affected, the financial position of the employer, and the need for deterrence. The Court applied established principles for the assessment of penalties under the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth), emphasising that penalties should be proportionate to the offending conduct and serve to uphold workplace standards. The Court also considered the level of responsibility and culpability of the directors in the contraventions. The Court ordered Her Fashion Box Pty Ltd to pay penalties totalling $108,000, and Ms. Nadia Bartolo and Ms. Tina Bartolo were each ordered to pay penalties of $18,000.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Penalty
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd and Anor (No.2) [2020] FCCA 2924
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Fair Work Ombudsman v Jenni International Pty Ltd and Anor (No.2)
[2020] FCCA 2924