Fair Work Ombudsman v DTF World Square Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4)
Case
•
[2024] FCA 341
•9 April 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fair Work Ombudsman v DTF World Square Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2024] FCA 341
[2024] FCA 341
9 April 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case involved the Fair Work Ombudsman (the Ombudsman) pursuing penalties against DTF World Square Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and its two former employees, Ms Handoko and Ms Parmenas, for multiple contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and associated regulations. The contraventions involved requiring employees to work unreasonable hours, failing to pay various rates and allowances, and creating false records. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia, with the Honourable Justice Siopis presiding. The primary legal issue the court had to address was the determination of appropriate pecuniary penalties for the respondents under the Fair Work Act, considering the nature and extent of the contraventions, the involvement of senior management, and the absence of specific deterrence or previous findings of contraventions.
In assessing the penalties, Justice Siopis noted that the penalty should be sufficient to achieve deterrence without being oppressive. The court found that the contraventions were part of a systematic pattern of conduct by the respondents, who deliberately deprived employees of their entitlements and created false records to conceal their actions. Given the severity of the conduct, which affected numerous employees over extended periods, the court determined that significant penalties were necessary to serve as a deterrent. The court calculated the penalties based on the maximum number of penalty units applicable during the contravention period and considered the involvement of senior management, including Ms Handoko and Ms Parmenas, in the contraventions.
The final orders of the court required DTF World Square Pty Ltd (in liquidation) to pay $1,997,100, the second respondent to pay $1,896,300, and Ms Handoko and Ms Parmenas to pay $92,232 and $105,084 respectively. The court also ordered that these penalties be paid within 35 days to the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Commonwealth and granted the applicant liberty to apply for enforcement in case of non-compliance.
In assessing the penalties, Justice Siopis noted that the penalty should be sufficient to achieve deterrence without being oppressive. The court found that the contraventions were part of a systematic pattern of conduct by the respondents, who deliberately deprived employees of their entitlements and created false records to conceal their actions. Given the severity of the conduct, which affected numerous employees over extended periods, the court determined that significant penalties were necessary to serve as a deterrent. The court calculated the penalties based on the maximum number of penalty units applicable during the contravention period and considered the involvement of senior management, including Ms Handoko and Ms Parmenas, in the contraventions.
The final orders of the court required DTF World Square Pty Ltd (in liquidation) to pay $1,997,100, the second respondent to pay $1,896,300, and Ms Handoko and Ms Parmenas to pay $92,232 and $105,084 respectively. The court also ordered that these penalties be paid within 35 days to the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Commonwealth and granted the applicant liberty to apply for enforcement in case of non-compliance.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Civil Penalty
-
Fraud
-
Mens Rea & Intention
-
Statutory Interpretation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Labour Hire Licensing Authority v Gobally Talent Group Pty Ltd [2025] VMC 9
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Fair Work Ombudsman v Mai
[2025] FCA 421
Fair Work Ombudsman v Blue Sky Kids Land Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4)
[2024] FCA 1475
Fair Work Ombudsman v Sushi Bay Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3)
[2024] FCA 869