Fair Work Ombudsman v ANSA Finance Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2022] FedCFamC2G 833
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Fair Work Ombudsman v ANSA Finance Pty Ltd [2022] FedCFamC2G 833
[2022] FedCFamC2G 833
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Ombudsman filed proceedings against ANSA Finance Pty Ltd and its director, Mr Fuoco, in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, alleging contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). The primary dispute involves ANSA Finance's failure to comply with four separate compliance notices issued by Fair Work Inspectors. These notices pertained to underpayments of wages and entitlements to employees Ms Chawla, Mr Mantzioukas, Ms White, and Mr Jern. The central legal issues centred around whether ANSA Finance had a reasonable excuse for its non-compliance with the compliance notices and if Mr Fuoco was accessorily liable for the contraventions.
The Court found that the Fair Work Inspectors had formed reasonable beliefs that ANSA Finance had contravened the provisions of the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2020 and the National Employment Standards (NES). This was based on the information available to the Inspectors at the time the reasonable beliefs were formed. ANSA Finance did not challenge the validity of the compliance notices or the reasonable belief held by the Inspectors. The Court held that ANSA Finance had not demonstrated a reasonable excuse for its failure to comply with the notices. The company's decision not to comply with the notices was a matter of choice, not capacity. The Court found that ANSA Finance had failed to provide payslips to Mr Mantzioukas within one working day of paying him for work performed, contravening section 536(1) of the FW Act. Furthermore, the Court found Mr Fuoco accessorily liable for ANSA Finance's contraventions under section 550(1) of the FW Act.
The Court ordered that ANSA Finance pay pecuniary penalties for each contravention and Mr Fuoco pay a penalty for his involvement in the contraventions. Additionally, the Court ordered ANSA Finance to rectify the underpayments to the affected employees and provide payslips to Mr Mantzioukas. The Court also made orders for costs in favour of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
The Court found that the Fair Work Inspectors had formed reasonable beliefs that ANSA Finance had contravened the provisions of the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2020 and the National Employment Standards (NES). This was based on the information available to the Inspectors at the time the reasonable beliefs were formed. ANSA Finance did not challenge the validity of the compliance notices or the reasonable belief held by the Inspectors. The Court held that ANSA Finance had not demonstrated a reasonable excuse for its failure to comply with the notices. The company's decision not to comply with the notices was a matter of choice, not capacity. The Court found that ANSA Finance had failed to provide payslips to Mr Mantzioukas within one working day of paying him for work performed, contravening section 536(1) of the FW Act. Furthermore, the Court found Mr Fuoco accessorily liable for ANSA Finance's contraventions under section 550(1) of the FW Act.
The Court ordered that ANSA Finance pay pecuniary penalties for each contravention and Mr Fuoco pay a penalty for his involvement in the contraventions. Additionally, the Court ordered ANSA Finance to rectify the underpayments to the affected employees and provide payslips to Mr Mantzioukas. The Court also made orders for costs in favour of the Fair Work Ombudsman.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Reasonable Belief
-
Compliance Notice
-
Reasonable Excuse
-
Accessorial Liability
-
Unconscionable Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fair Work Ombudsman v Agile Group (Global) Pty Ltd [2025] FedCFamC2G 46
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Fair Work Omsbudsman v Fimmano as Trustee for the Trustee for R & R River Trust
[2025] FedCFamC2G 1578
Fair Work Ombudsman v Western Chinese Language School Incorporated
[2025] FedCFamC2G 298
Fair Work Ombudsman v Agile Group (Global) Pty Ltd
[2025] FedCFamC2G 46
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
0
Fair Work Ombudsman v Baal Gammon Copper Pty Ltd
[2021] FCCA 348
Fair Work Ombudsman v Anahata Naturals Pty Ltd
[2014] FCCA 2954
Fair Work Ombudsman v Gothic Downs Pty Ltd
[2022] FedCFamC2G 21