Fair Work Ombudsman v ACN 146 435 118 Pty Ltd & Anor (No.2)
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 1270
•5 September 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN v ACN 146 435 118 PTY LTD & ANOR (No.2)
[2013] FCCA 1270
[2013] FCCA 1270
5 September 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, Judge Lucev considered the dispute between the Fair Work Ombudsman and ACN 146 435 118 Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Mr. David John Smith. The proceedings concerned alleged contraventions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by the corporate respondent, with Mr. Smith alleged to be involved in those contraventions.
The court was required to determine whether the corporate respondent had contravened specific provisions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to pay minimum entitlements to its employees, and whether Mr. Smith was involved in those contraventions. The proceedings also sought declarations and pecuniary penalties for the alleged breaches.
Judge Lucev found that the corporate respondent had contravened the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to pay minimum wages and entitlements to its employees. The court also found that Mr. Smith was involved in these contraventions, applying the principles of accessory liability under section 550 of the Act. The court considered the nature and extent of the contraventions, the number of employees affected, and the period over which the breaches occurred in its assessment. The court ultimately made declarations of contravention against both respondents and ordered the corporate respondent to pay pecuniary penalties, with Mr. Smith also ordered to pay penalties for his involvement.
The court was required to determine whether the corporate respondent had contravened specific provisions of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to pay minimum entitlements to its employees, and whether Mr. Smith was involved in those contraventions. The proceedings also sought declarations and pecuniary penalties for the alleged breaches.
Judge Lucev found that the corporate respondent had contravened the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by failing to pay minimum wages and entitlements to its employees. The court also found that Mr. Smith was involved in these contraventions, applying the principles of accessory liability under section 550 of the Act. The court considered the nature and extent of the contraventions, the number of employees affected, and the period over which the breaches occurred in its assessment. The court ultimately made declarations of contravention against both respondents and ordered the corporate respondent to pay pecuniary penalties, with Mr. Smith also ordered to pay penalties for his involvement.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Fair Work Ombudsman v Klinsic Constructions Pty Limited (No 2) [2023] FedCFamC2G 283
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Fair Work Ombudsman v QHA Foods Pty Ltd
[2019] FCCA 3120
Fair Work Ombudsman v Nobrace Centre Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)
[2019] FCCA 2970
Fair Work Ombudsman v Wok Me Corporate NQ Pty Ltd
[2018] FCCA 2635
Cases Cited
45
Statutory Material Cited
7
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distribution Ltd (No 2)
[2002] FCA 559
Blandy v Coverdale NT Pty Ltd
[2008] FCA 1533
Brobbel v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd
[2008] FMCA 714