[2013] FWC 9514 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 5, Item 6 - Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise and State PS awards) after first 2 years
National Fire Industry Association; Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia - Plumbing Division
(AM2012/146 & others)
Plumbing industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 16 DECEMBER 2013 |
Modern Award Review 2012 - application to vary the Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2010 - modern award varied.
[1] The Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2010 1(PFS Award) was varied on 19 July 20132 to give effect to the Modern Awards Review 2012 decision.3
[2] One of the variations introduced a new Schedule G—All-purpose rates of pay to provide a summation of the operation of all-purpose rates and to provide “clarity and an easy to use reference point”. 4
[3] Communication was received from the Chamber of Commerce and Industry Western Australia (CCIWA) on 15 November 2013, which raised a potential error in the determination, reflecting a disparity between clause 21.1(h)—Sprinkler fitters adjustment and the new Schedule G (clause G.3—Fire sprinkler fitting).
[4] In a statement of 20 November 2013, that possible error, and others identified by the Fair Work Commission (the Commission), in relation to clause G.3 of Schedule G were drawn to the attention of interested parties. An opportunity was afforded to interested parties to put submissions as to the potential errors by 29 November 2013. The statement and the submissions received were posted on the Modern Awards Review 2012 website in the usual way.
[5] One submission, receivedon 2 December 2013,was made in response to the statement, a submission by the Master Plumbers and Mechanical Services Association of Australia (MPA). The submission accepted that a referencing error appeared in clause 21.1(f)(i), (iii) and (iv) and a proposed replacement clause G.3 of Schedule G was developed, following discussion with other interested parties, which corrected errors identified in my statement of 20 November 2013.
[6] I am satisfied that clause G.3 of Schedule G, as published on 19 July 2013 5 contains errors in clause 21.1(f)(i), (iii) and (iv) and the summation of the substantive allowance provisions within the PFS Award and that they should be corrected by a determination in the form proposed by the MPA, save for the repetition of the row for the Adult apprentice. The determination, which is in the nature of a correction determination, will have effect from the first full pay period commencing on or after 19 July 2013.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 MA000036.
2 [2013] FWC 2987 and PR539029.
3 [2012] FWAFB 5600.
4 [2013] FWC 2987, at para 79.
5 PR539029.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, MA000036 PR545289>
- AGLC
- FAIR WORK COMMISSION - Sch. 5, Item 6 - Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise and State PS awards) after first 2 years [2013] FWC 9514
- Case
- [2013] FWC 9514
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes to the award were warranted and in line with the principles of fairness and contemporary employment practices. The Commission had to assess the application against the criteria established for modern award reviews, including the need for the award to maintain a safety net of minimum entitlements, provide fair and equitable wages and conditions, and not undermine the intent of the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the changes would adversely affect the balance of workplace relations.
In delivering its decision, the Commission noted the importance of modern awards in providing a safety net of minimum entitlements while also facilitating flexibility and enterprise bargaining. The Commission determined that the proposed changes to the award were necessary to reflect changes in the industry and to maintain the award's effectiveness in providing fair and equitable wages and conditions. The Commission found that the modifications did not undermine the objectives of the Fair Work Act and would not adversely affect the balance of workplace relations. Consequently, the Commission varied the award as per the application.
The Fair Work Commission ordered the amendment of the Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2010, implementing the changes as proposed in the application. The new provisions came into effect from the date specified in the order, ensuring that the award continues to provide a fair and equitable framework for employment in the plumbing and fire sprinklers industry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.