Facton Ltd v HADIA El-Sayadi

Link copied
Case Copied 18 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FACTON LTD & ORS v HADIA EL-SAYADI [2011] FMCA 617

COPYRIGHT – Sale of counterfeit clothing items – where respondent claimed to be unaware of counterfeit status of goods and lack of money to pay compensation – whether respondent was aware of status of goods – default judgment – where no defence filed – quantum of damages – general damages, damages for loss of reputation, damages for flagrant infringement – tort of passing off – infringement of trademark – contravention of the Fair Trading Act.

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – assessment of costs.

Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), s.120
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), ss.42, 44
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), ss.115(2), (4)
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001
Adidas-Salomon AT v Turner (2003) 58 IPR 66
Facton Ltd & Ors v Chung Lim Sports Cap Pty Ltd Limited & Ors [2010] FMCA 584
Review Australia Pty Ltd v New Cover Group Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1589
Review Australia v Innovative Lifestyle Investments Pty Ltd & Anor [2008] FCA 74
Elwood Clothing Pty Ltd v Cotton On Clothing Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 633
Universal Music v Hendy Petroleum [2003] FMCA 373
Phonographic Performance & Ors v Adelaide City Entertainment (No.2) [2005] FMCA 1075
Fraserside Holdings & Anor v Venus Adult Shops & Ors [2005] FMCA 997 Microsoft Corporation v Wordsworth [2007] FMCA 2071
Australasian Performing Right Association v Cougars Tavern & Ors [2008] FMCA 369
Top Plus Pty Ltd & Ors v K Square Pty Ltd & Ors (No.4) [2010] FMCA 671
Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited v All Girls Entertainment Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] FMCA 593
Facton Ltd & Ors v Yuan  [2011] FMCA 266
Facton Ltd & Ors v Dash Industries Pty Ltd & Anor [2010] FMCA 709
Commonwealth of Australia v Kelly [2004] FCA 654
First Applicant: FACTON LTD
Second Applicant: G-STAR RAW C.V
Third Applicant:

G-STAR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD

ACN 084 011 852

Respondent: HADIA EL-SAYADI
File Number: MLG 1462 of 2010
Judgment of: Raphael FM
Hearing date: 4 August 2011
Date of Last Submission: 4 August 2011
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 4 August 2011

REPRESENTATION

Solicitors for the Applicants: Middletons
For the Respondent: In person

ORDERS

The Court declares that in the sale of the goods described in the affidavits of Morrie Michael Fahd sworn 28 July 2011, Melissa Kylie Range sworn 29 July 2011 and Leanne Gai Smith sworn 28 July 2011:

(a)The Respondent has infringed the G-Star Trade Marks (as defined in paragraph 5 of the Statement of Claim) in breach of s.120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (“TMA”);

(b)The Respondent has contravened ss.42 and 44 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) (“FTA”);

(c)The Respondent has engaged in conduct which constitutes the tort of passing off.

The Court orders that the Respondent, whether by herself, her servants, employees, agents or otherwise howsoever, deliver up to the Applicants within 21 days of the date of this Order:

(a)All the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Facton Ltd v HADIA El-Sayadi and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] FMCA 617
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Facton Ltd v HADIA El-Sayadi involved a claim by Facton Ltd against HADIA El-Sayadi for the sale of counterfeit clothing items. The dispute was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Facton Ltd alleged that El-Sayadi had infringed its trademarks, contravened provisions of the Fair Trading Act, and engaged in the tort of passing off by selling counterfeit goods without permission. El-Sayadi claimed that she was unaware of the counterfeit nature of the goods and lacked the funds to compensate the plaintiffs.

The legal issues before the court included whether El-Sayadi was aware of the counterfeit status of the goods, the appropriateness of the default judgment entered against her due to her failure to file a defence, and the quantum of damages to be awarded. The court had to determine if El-Sayadi's claims of unawareness and financial inability were credible, and if so, whether they would absolve her from liability. Additionally, the court needed to assess the appropriate amount of damages, including general damages, damages for loss of reputation, and damages for flagrant infringement.

The court found that El-Sayadi had infringed the G-Star trademarks and contravened the Fair Trading Act by selling counterfeit goods. Despite her claims of unawareness and financial incapacity, the court concluded that El-Sayadi had been aware of the counterfeit status of the goods. Consequently, the default judgment was upheld, and El-Sayadi was ordered to deliver up all counterfeit goods, promotional materials, and other infringing items. The court awarded Facton Ltd damages for copyright infringement and ordered El-Sayadi to pay additional costs.

The final orders of the court declared that El-Sayadi had infringed the G-Star trademarks, contravened the Fair Trading Act, and engaged in the tort of passing off. The court mandated the delivery of all counterfeit goods and promotional materials to Facton Ltd and ordered El-Sayadi to pay damages and costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court declares that in the sale of the goods described in the affidavits of Morrie Michael Fahd sworn 28 July 2011, Melissa Kylie Range sworn 29 July 2011 and Leanne Gai Smith sworn 28 July 2011:

(a) The Respondent has infringed the G-Star Trade Marks (as defined in paragraph 5 of the Statement of Claim) in breach of s.120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (“TMA”);

(b) The Respondent has contravened ss.42 and 44 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) (“FTA”);

(c) The Respondent has engaged in conduct which constitutes the tort of passing off.

The Court orders that the Respondent, whether by herself, her servants, employees, agents or otherwise howsoever, deliver up to the Applicants within 21 days of the date of this Order:

(a) All the Collectable Garments as defined in the Amended Statement of Claim in her possession, custody or control;

(b) All the garments or accessories in her possession, custody or control which feature the Trade Marks or the Copyright Works as defined in the Amended Statement of Claim which have been applied without the consent or licence of the Applicants or any of them;

(c) Any and all brochures, pamphlets, advertising, labels, swing tags, promotional or marketing material and the like in her power, possession, custody or control which bear the G-Star Trade Marks or the Copyright Works; and

(d) Any materials, products or things in the Respondent’s power, possession or control, the exploitation of which by the Respondent would be an infringement of the foregoing injunctions.

(e) The Respondent to pay the Applicants the sum of $22,854.06 in damages for breach of s.115(2) of the Copyright Act 1968 and $30,000.00 for breach of s.115(4) of the Copyright Act 1968.

(f) The Respondent to pay the Applicants’ costs assessed in the sum of $19,723.94.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.