F, RPJ v The Queen

F, RPJ
v
THE QUEEN
[2020] HCASL 103
A37/2019

An extension of time is required to enable this amended application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The proposed ground of appeal raised by this application for special leave to appeal from the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia (Nicholson J; Kourakis CJ and Hughes J agreeing) does not raise a question of principle and otherwise has insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

M.M Gordon J.J Edelman

17 April 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of F, RPJ v The Queen involves an application for special leave to appeal against a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia. The applicant sought to appeal against the dismissal of his application for leave to appeal against his conviction and sentence for various serious criminal offences, including drug trafficking and firearms offences. The application for special leave to appeal was made to the High Court of Australia, which has the discretion to grant special leave where the case involves a question of law of general public importance or where the case has other significant features.

The primary legal issue that the High Court was required to determine was whether the proposed ground of appeal raised by the applicant had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The Court had to consider whether the proposed ground of appeal involved a question of principle or whether it had other significant features that would warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The Court also had to consider whether the proposed ground of appeal had sufficient prospects of success.

The High Court found that the proposed ground of appeal did not raise a question of principle and otherwise had insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The Court held that the proposed ground of appeal was based on a misinterpretation of the evidence and a misapplication of the law. The Court held that it would be futile to grant an extension of time to enable the amended application for special leave to appeal to proceed. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal.

The Court made an order dismissing the application for special leave to appeal and directing the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal the order. The order was made on 17 April 2020 by Gordon J and Edelman J. The Court's decision was final and binding, and the applicant was not entitled to further appeal.

Keep reading for free

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established