F and F (No.2)

Case [2005] FMCAfam 41


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

F & F (No.2) [2005] FMCAfam 41

CHILD SUPPORT – Application for departure – children concerned in shared care arrangement – husband engaged in full time employment – wife engaged in tertiary studies and part-time work – application of formula results in nil assessment for wife – whether wife fully utilising her income earning capacity – hardship to husband – whether just and equitable to make departure order.

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, ss.3, 4, 114, 116, 117

Savery and Savery (1990) FLC 92-131
In the Marriage of Gyselman (1992) 15 FLR 219
Dwyer v McGuire (1993) FLC 92-420
Hendy & The Deputy Child Support Registrar and Webb [2001] FamCA 632
DJM v JLM (1998) FLC 92-816

Applicant: D R F
Respondent: V M F
File No: DNM 500 of 2004
Delivered on: 14 February 2005
Delivered at: Alice Springs
Hearing date: 7 February 2005
Judgment of: Brown FM

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms H
Solicitors for the Applicant: S & A
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms O
Solicitors for the Respondent: N T L A C

ORDERS

  1. That orders one and two of the orders made on 16 December 2004 be discharged.

  2. That pursuant to section 117 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 there be a departure from the administrative assessment of child support.

  3. For the period from 1 November 2004 to 31 December 2005 the father’s child support income be fixed at an annual rate of $70,000.00 and the mother’s child support income be fixed an annual rate of $32,000.00 for the same period.

  4. That the application be otherwise dismissed.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
DARWIN

DNM 500 of 2005

D R F

Applicant

And

V M F

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. These proceedings relate to child support and whether there should be any departure from the child support assessment procedure in respect of three children, namely J D F, who was born on 24 February 1997;


    J T F, who was born on 18 March 1999; and D J F, who was born on


    1 November 2001.

  2. The applicant in the proceedings is D R F, who is the children’s father.  The respondent in the proceedings is V M F, who is the children’s mother.  For obvious reasons of convenience, I will refer to Mr F as “the father” in these reasons for judgement and to Ms F as “the mother”.

  3. The father commenced these proceedings on 1 November 2004.  He seeks the following orders:

    1.   

    That pursuant to section 117 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, there be a departure from administrative assessment of child support for J D F born


    24 February 1997, J T F born 18 March 1999 and D J F born 28 April 2001 payable by the father to the mother as follows:

    a) the annual rate of child support be set at $7,500.00 from 17 July 2003 and be adjusted each 17 July thereafter in accordance with any change…

Continue reading F and F (No.2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
F and F (No.2) [2005] FMCAfam 41
Case
[2005] FMCAfam 41
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of F and F (No.2) involved a dispute between the father and the mother regarding the calculation of child support payments. The matter was heard in the Family Court of Australia. The father contested the administrative assessment of child support payments made under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, arguing that the assessment did not accurately reflect his income and the mother’s income, which in turn affected the child support payments he was required to make.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the administrative assessment of child support was accurate, and if not, what adjustments should be made to the income figures used in the calculation. The court had to determine whether there were grounds to depart from the administrative assessment and, if so, what the appropriate income figures should be. The court also needed to consider whether the application for review was timely and if the evidence provided supported the claims made by the father.

The court found that there were grounds to depart from the administrative assessment. It considered the evidence provided by both parties and determined that the assessment did not accurately reflect the father’s income, which was significantly higher than what was used in the administrative assessment. The court fixed the father’s child support income at an annual rate of $70,000.00 and the mother’s child support income at an annual rate of $32,000.00 for the specified period. The court concluded that the application was otherwise dismissed, and orders one and two of the previous orders made on 16 December 2004 were discharged.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That orders one and two of the orders made on 16 December 2004 be discharged.

2.

That pursuant to section 117 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 there be a departure from the administrative assessment of child support.

3.

For the period from 1 November 2004 to 31 December 2005 the father’s child support income be fixed at an annual rate of $70,000.00 and the mother’s child support income be fixed an annual rate of $32,000.00 for the same period.

4.

That the application be otherwise dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.