"F" (A CHILD) -v- THE QUEEN [2001] WASCA 247
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2001] WASCA 247 | |
| COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL | |||
| Case No: | CCA:234/2000 | 18 MAY 2001 | |
| Coram: | WALLWORK J SCOTT J WHEELER J | 21/08/01 | |
| 13 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | No error by sentencing JudgeLeave to appeal granted Appeal dismissed | ||
| D | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | "F" (A CHILD) THE QUEEN |
Catchwords: | Criminal law Sentencing Wilful murder Life imprisonment Children's Court 16-year-old Stabbed and killed his former girlfriend aged 16 years Planned attack Multiple stab wounds Assailant apparently calm during and after attack Pleaded guilty to offence Family background chaotic Offender mentally disturbed 12 year minimum term On appeal |
Legislation: | Nil |
Case References: | "RC" A Child (1995) 83 A Crim R 561 Nevermann (1989) 42 A Crim, R 347 Azzaddin v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 474 "B" v The Queen (1991) 7915 and 7916 of 1991 "C" v The Queen (1991) Children's Court ofWA "C1" v The Queen (1994) SCt of WA "C2" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA "E" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA "G" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA "I" v The Queen (1993) SCt of WA Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 "M" v The Queen (1996) Children's Court of WA Monaghan v The Queen (1990) 3 WAR 467 "N" v The Queen (1992) SCt of WA |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : "F" (A CHILD) -v- THE QUEEN [2001] WASCA 247 CORAM : WALLWORK J
- SCOTT J
WHEELER J
- Applicant
AND
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Catchwords:
Criminal law - Sentencing - Wilful murder - Life imprisonment - Children's Court - 16-year-old - Stabbed and killed his former girlfriend aged 16 years - Planned attack - Multiple stab wounds - Assailant apparently calm during and after attack - Pleaded guilty to offence - Family background chaotic - Offender mentally disturbed - 12 year minimum term - On appeal
Legislation:
Nil
(Page 2)
Result:
No error by sentencing Judge
Leave to appeal granted
Appeal dismissed
Category: D
Representation:
Counsel:
Applicant : In person
Respondent : Mr R E Cock QC
Solicitors:
Applicant : In person
Respondent : State Director of Public Prosecutions
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Nevermann (1989) 42 A Crim R 347
"RC" A Child (1995) 83 A Crim R 561
Case(s) also cited:
Azzaddin v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 474
"B" v The Queen (1991) 7915 and 7916 of 1991
"C" v The Queen (1991) Children's Court ofWA
"C1" v The Queen (1994) SCt of WA
"C2" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"E" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"G" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"I" v The Queen (1993) SCt of WA
Lowndes v…
Continue reading "F" (A Child) v The Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- "F" (A Child) v The Queen [2001] WASCA 247
- Case
- [2001] WASCA 247
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the sentence imposed by the Children's Court was appropriate, given the circumstances of the offence and the age of the offender, and whether the Court of Appeal should grant leave to appeal and, if so, whether the appeal should succeed. The court was required to consider the principles of sentencing for serious offences committed by young people, including the need for deterrence, protection of society, and the potential for rehabilitation.
The court found that the Children's Court had correctly applied the relevant sentencing principles and that the sentence imposed was appropriate in the circumstances. The court noted that the offence was premeditated and carried out with a high degree of violence, and that the appellant had shown no remorse. The court also considered the appellant's family background and mental health issues but found that these did not mitigate the seriousness of the offence. The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the sentencing. The appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
The final orders of the court were that no error was found in the sentencing by the Children's Court, leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed. The original sentence of life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 12 years was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
No error by sentencing
JudgeLeave to appeal granted
Appeal dismissed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.