"F" (A Child) v The Queen

Case [2001] WASCA 247


"F" (A CHILD) -v- THE QUEEN [2001] WASCA 247



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2001] WASCA 247
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Case No:CCA:234/200018 MAY 2001
Coram:WALLWORK J
SCOTT J
WHEELER J
21/08/01
13Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: No error by sentencing
JudgeLeave to appeal granted
Appeal dismissed
D
PDF Version
Parties:"F" (A CHILD)
THE QUEEN

Catchwords:

Criminal law
Sentencing
Wilful murder
Life imprisonment
Children's Court
16-year-old
Stabbed and killed his former girlfriend aged 16 years
Planned attack
Multiple stab wounds
Assailant apparently calm during and after attack
Pleaded guilty to offence
Family background chaotic
Offender mentally disturbed
12 year minimum term
On appeal

Legislation:

Nil

Case References:

"RC" A Child (1995) 83 A Crim R 561
Nevermann (1989) 42 A Crim, R 347

Azzaddin v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 474
"B" v The Queen (1991) 7915 and 7916 of 1991
"C" v The Queen (1991) Children's Court ofWA
"C1" v The Queen (1994) SCt of WA
"C2" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"E" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"G" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"I" v The Queen (1993) SCt of WA
Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665
"M" v The Queen (1996) Children's Court of WA
Monaghan v The Queen (1990) 3 WAR 467
"N" v The Queen (1992) SCt of WA

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : "F" (A CHILD) -v- THE QUEEN [2001] WASCA 247 CORAM : WALLWORK J
    SCOTT J
    WHEELER J
HEARD : 18 MAY 2001 DELIVERED : 21 AUGUST 2001 FILE NO/S : CCA 234 of 2000 BETWEEN : "F" (A CHILD)
    Applicant

    AND

    THE QUEEN
    Respondent



Catchwords:

Criminal law - Sentencing - Wilful murder - Life imprisonment - Children's Court - 16-year-old - Stabbed and killed his former girlfriend aged 16 years - Planned attack - Multiple stab wounds - Assailant apparently calm during and after attack - Pleaded guilty to offence - Family background chaotic - Offender mentally disturbed - 12 year minimum term - On appeal




Legislation:

Nil



(Page 2)

Result:

No error by sentencing Judge


Leave to appeal granted
Appeal dismissed


Category: D


Representation:


Counsel:


    Applicant : In person
    Respondent : Mr R E Cock QC


Solicitors:

    Applicant : In person
    Respondent : State Director of Public Prosecutions


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Nevermann (1989) 42 A Crim R 347
"RC" A Child (1995) 83 A Crim R 561

Case(s) also cited:



Azzaddin v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 474
"B" v The Queen (1991) 7915 and 7916 of 1991
"C" v The Queen (1991) Children's Court ofWA
"C1" v The Queen (1994) SCt of WA
"C2" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"E" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"G" v The Queen (1995) SCt of WA
"I" v The Queen (1993) SCt of WA
Lowndes v…

Continue reading "F" (A Child) v The Queen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
"F" (A Child) v The Queen [2001] WASCA 247
Case
[2001] WASCA 247
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter under consideration is an appeal against the sentencing of a 16-year-old who was found guilty of murdering his former girlfriend, also aged 16, by stabbing her multiple times. The case was heard in the Children's Court of Victoria and subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal. The appellant, referred to as "F" for the purposes of this summary, pleaded guilty to the offence of murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 12 years.

The legal issues before the court were whether the sentence imposed by the Children's Court was appropriate, given the circumstances of the offence and the age of the offender, and whether the Court of Appeal should grant leave to appeal and, if so, whether the appeal should succeed. The court was required to consider the principles of sentencing for serious offences committed by young people, including the need for deterrence, protection of society, and the potential for rehabilitation.

The court found that the Children's Court had correctly applied the relevant sentencing principles and that the sentence imposed was appropriate in the circumstances. The court noted that the offence was premeditated and carried out with a high degree of violence, and that the appellant had shown no remorse. The court also considered the appellant's family background and mental health issues but found that these did not mitigate the seriousness of the offence. The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the sentencing. The appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.

The final orders of the court were that no error was found in the sentencing by the Children's Court, leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed. The original sentence of life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 12 years was upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

No error by sentencing

JudgeLeave to appeal granted

Appeal dismissed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.