Extradition (Canada) Regulations 2004 (Cth)

Extradition (Canada) Regulations 2004

Statutory Rules 2004 No. 167 as amended

made under the

Extradition Act 1988

This compilation was prepared on 20 September 2012

taking into account amendments up to SLI 2012 No. 210

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing,

Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra

Contents

    1Name of Regulations [see Note 1]

These Regulations are the Extradition (Canada) Regulations 2004.

2Commencement [see Note 1]

These Regulations commence on the date of their notification in the Gazette.

3Definition

In these Regulations:

Act means the Extradition Act 1988.

4Declaration that Canada is an extradition country

Canada is declared to be an extradition country.

6Application of the Act in relation to Canada

For the purposes of the application of the Act in relation to Canada and:

1. (a)

   relying on paragraph 11 (1) (b) and subsection 11 (2) of the Act, paragraph 17 (2) (a) of the Act is modified by omitting ‘45 days’ and substituting ‘60 days’; and

2. (b)

   relying on paragraph 11 (1) (b) of the Act, in addition to the supporting documents within the meaning of paragraph 19 (2) (a) of the Act, a statement of the identity, nationality and physical description of the person is required to be produced to a magistrate for the purposes of subsection 19 (1) of the Act.

Notes to the Extradition (Canada) Regulations 2004

Note 1

The Extradition (Canada) Regulations 2004 (in force under the Extradition Act 1988) as shown in this compilation comprise Statutory Rules 2004 No. 167 amended as indicated in the Tables below.

Table of Instruments

Year and Number	Date of notification in Gazette or FRLI registration	Date of commencement	Application, saving or transitional provisions
2004 No. 167	1 July 2004	1 July 2004
2012 No. 210	3 Sept 2012 (see F2012L01825)	Schedule 3: 20 Sept 2012 (see s. 2)	—

Table of Amendments

ad. = added or inserted am. = amended rep. = repealed rs. = repealed and substituted
Provision affected	How affected
R. 5...........................................	rep. 2012 No. 210