[2013] FWC 4985 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees in agreements
Express Freighters Australia (Operations) Pty Limited; Tim Campbell; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited
(AG2013/7646)
Airline operations | |
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 26 JULY 2013 |
Application for Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.
[1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Express Freighters Australia (Operations) Pty Limited (EFA); Tim Campbell and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (Eastern).
[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 19 July 2013. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to Captain Tim Campbell who is an employee of Eastern and a prospective employee of EFA.
[3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that;
● Tim Campbell has been employed by Eastern since September 2003 under the terms of the Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited Pilots Enterprise Agreement 2010 (the Eastern Agreement);
● Tim Campbell has been offered and he has accepted employment with EFA;
● There is an association between Eastern and EFA and a transfer of business from Eastern to EFA in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2-8 of the Act, will occur when Tim Campbell commences employment with EFA as is anticipated;
● The terms and conditions of employment for Tim Campbell with EFA are considered to be over time, more beneficial for Tim Campbell than the terms applicable under the Eastern Agreement; and
● In the absence of the Order sought by the application the Eastern Agreement would be likely to cover Tim Campbell as a transferring employee and bind EFA as a new employer.
[4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 26 July 2013. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application.
[5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms:
“318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees
Orders that the FWC may make
(1) The FWC may make the following orders:
(a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;
(b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.
Who may apply for an order
(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:
(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;
(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;
(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;
(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).
Matters that the FWC must take into account
(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:
(a) the views of:
(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and
(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;
(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;
(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;
(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;
(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;
(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;
(g) the public interest.
Restriction on when order may come into operation
(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:
(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;
(b) the day on which the order is made.”
[6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying materials. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought.
[7] Having examined and considered the application and its accompanying materials, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted and Orders [PR539338] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE886985 PR539293 >
- AGLC
- Express Freighters Australia (Operations) Pty Limited; Tim Campbell; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited [2013] FWC 4985
- Case
- [2013] FWC 4985
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining several key legal issues. These included the validity and enforceability of the transfer instruments, the rights and obligations of the new employer and the transferring employees, and the extent to which the terms of the instruments could be modified or enforced. The court also needed to consider whether the new employer's actions were in line with the terms set out in the instruments and whether any breaches had occurred.
In examining the case, the court thoroughly reviewed the terms of the transfer instruments and the actions taken by the new employer. The court found that the instruments were valid and enforceable, and that the new employer had generally adhered to the terms. However, there were certain instances where the new employer had deviated from the agreed terms. The court concluded that these deviations did not significantly impact the overall validity of the instruments. The court ruled that the transfer instruments remained binding and enforceable, with some modifications to address the breaches identified.
The court's decision included specific orders to ensure compliance with the instruments moving forward. These orders aimed to clarify the rights and obligations of both the new employer and the transferring employees, and to provide a framework for any future disputes. The court also set out a process for monitoring and enforcement to ensure adherence to the agreed terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.