ex parte

[1981] FCA 288

I N T H E F E D E R A L C O U R T OF' AUSTRALIA )

D I V I S I O N	G E N E R A L	1
)

BANKRUPTCY	D I S T R I C T 'OF' THE	STATE'	OF	) No. 586 of 1978
1

NEW SOUTH	WALES	.AND	T H E
AUSTRALIAN	CAPITAL	TERRITORY	1

R E :	JAMES HUNTER
EX PARTE:	A C M I L  I N D U S T R I E S PTY. L I M I T E D
formerly F.'  & T. B U I L D I N G
P R O D U C T S  P T Y . L I M I T E D ( w r o n g l y
called F.  '& T. B U I L D I N G
PRODUCTS  LIMITED t r a d i n g as
'PGH  CERMAICS

ORDER

JUDGE MAKING ORDER: LOCKHART J.

WHERE MADE : AT SYDNEY

DATE O F ORDER:  F R I D A Y 1 MAY 1 9 8 1

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

The appl ica t ion be dismissed

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA	) )
GENERAL DIVISION	1 1
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF	) No. 586 Of 1978 \
NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
1
AUSTRAL'IAN CAPITAL TERRITORY	1

RE :	JAMES HUNTER
EX PARTE:	ACMIL INDUSTRIES PTY. LIMITED formerly F. & T. BUILDING PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED (wrongly called F. & T. BUILDING PRODUCT LIMITED trading as PGH CERAd-rlS

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

LOCKHART J.

1 May . . 1981

AT SYDNEY

This is an application to review the decision of a

Deputy Registrar in Bankruptcy disallowing certain items on the taxation of a bill of costs, all being claims for the "travelling time" of the solicitor for the petitioning creditor between

Miranda, where he has his office, and this Court or its Registry.	Y
The same questions are involved	in this appeal as arose	in the
application for review in the matter	of Dacey in respect	of which

I have just given judgment. The result is the same, namely

that the application fails.