Evidence Regulations 1995 (Cth)
made under the
This compilation was prepared on 27 December 2011
taking into account amendments up to SLI 2011 No. 227
Prepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing,
Attorney‑General’s Department, Canberra
These Regulations are the
Evidence Regulations 1995 .
These Regulations commence on 18 April 1995.
(1) In these Regulations, unless the contrary intention appears:
Act means theEvidence Act 1995 .
address includes a private, business or official address.
notice of previous representation means a notice given under subsection 67 (1) of the Act.
notifying party , in relation to a notice, means the person giving the notice.
Note For notices of previous representation, see regulation 5.
(2) In these Regulations, a reference to a Form by number is a reference to the Form of that number set out in the Schedule.
Note Section 25C of theActs Interpretation Act 1901 provides that strict compliance with a form is not required and substantial compliance is sufficient.
For paragraph 8 (4) (a) of the Act, the following provisions of the
Evidence Act 1971 (ACT) are specified:
(a) Part 1;
(b) sections 63A, 68A and 72.
(1) This regulation is made for the purpose of section 67 of the Act.
(2) A notice of previous representation must state:
(a) subject to subregulation (6), the substance of evidence of a previous representation that the notifying party intends to adduce; and
(b) the substance of all other relevant representations made by the person who made that previous representation, so far as they are known to the notifying party; and
(c) particulars of:
(i) the date, time, place and circumstances at or in which each of the representations mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) was made; and
(ii) the names of the persons by whom, and the persons to whom, each of those representations was made; and
(iii) in a civil proceeding — the address of each person so named;
so far as they are known to the notifying party.
(3) If a notifying party intends to rely on any of paragraphs 63 (2) (a) or (b), 65 (2) (a), (b), (c) or (d), 65 (3) (a) or (b) or 65 (8) (a) or (b) of the Act, the party’s notice of previous representation must state particulars of the facts on the basis of which it is alleged that the person who made a representation referred to in the notice is not available to testify concerning the fact to be proved by adducing evidence of that representation.
(4) If a notifying party intends to rely on paragraph 64 (2) (a) or (b) of the Act, the party’s notice of previous representation must state particulars of the facts that the party will rely on to establish the grounds specified in subsection 64 (2) of the Act.
(5) If a notice of previous representation refers to a previous representation that is in writing:
(a) a copy of the document, or of the relevant portion of the document, containing the representation must be attached to the notice; and
(b) the notice must identify the document unless:
(i) a copy of the document is attached to the notice; and
(ii) the identity of the document is apparent on the face of the copy.
(6) Where a copy of a document, or of a portion of a document, is attached to a notice it is a sufficient compliance for the purposes of paragraph (2) (a) to specify in the notice, or in the copy of a document or portion of a document attached to the notice, the representation evidence of which the notifying party intends to adduce.
(7) On the application of a party in a criminal proceeding, the court may make an order directing the notifying party to disclose the address of any person named in a notice of previous representation.
(8) The direction may be given on the terms the court considers appropriate.
(1) This regulation is made for the purpose of section 99 of the Act.
(2) A notice given under subsection 97 (1) of the Act (relating to the
tendency rule) must state:
(a) the substance of the evidence of the kind referred to in that subsection that the party giving the notice intends to adduce; and
(b) if that evidence consists of, or includes, evidence of the conduct of a person, particulars of:
(i) the date, time, place and circumstances at or in which the conduct occurred; and
(ii) the names of each person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the conduct; and
(iii) in a civil proceeding — the address of each person so named;
so far as they are known to the notifying party.
(3) A notice given under subsection 98 (1) of the Act (relating to the ‘coincidence’ rule) must state:
(a) the substance of the evidence of the occurrence of 2 or more events that the party giving the notice intends to adduce; and
(b) particulars of:
(i) the date, time, place and circumstances at or in which each of those events occurred; and
(ii) the names of each person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived each of those events; and
(iii) in a civil proceeding — the address of each person so named;
so far as they are known to the notifying party.
(4) On the application of a party in a criminal proceeding, the court may make an order directing the notifying party to disclose the address of any person named in a notice mentioned in this regulation.
(5) The direction may be given on the terms the court considers appropriate.
(1) A certificate under section 128 or 128A of the Act may be in accordance with Form 1.
(2) A certificate is not liable to be called into question by reason of its non‑compliance with Form 1.
For paragraph 128 (13) (b) of the Act, the following provisions are prescribed for subsection 128 (12) of the Act:
(a) section 128 of the
Evidence Act 2008 (Vic);(b) section 11 of the
Evidence Act 1906 (WA);(c) section 128 of the
Evidence Act 2001 (Tas).
For the purposes of paragraph 179 (1) (a) of the Act, Form 2 is prescribed.
For the purposes of paragraph 180 (1) (a) of the Act, Form 3 is prescribed.
(1) For the definitions of
Australian lawyer ,Australian legal practitioner andAustralian practising certificate in Part 1 of the Dictionary at the end of the Act, the following laws are specified:
(a)
Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW);(b)
Legal Profession Act 2004 (Vic);(c)
Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld);(d)
Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA);(e)
Legal Practitioners Act 1981 (SA);(f)
Legal Profession Act 2007 (Tas);(g)
Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT);(h)
Legal Profession Act (NT).(2) For the definition of
Australian‑registered foreign lawyer in Part 1 of the Dictionary at the end of the Act, the following laws are specified:
(a)
Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW);(b)
Legal Profession Act 2004 (Vic);(c)
Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld);(d)
Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA);(e)
Legal Profession Act 2007 (Tas);(f)
Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT);(g) Legal Profession Act (NT).
(subregulation 3 (2))
(regulation 7)
[
CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 128 OR 128A OF THE
This Court certifies under
section 128*/128A* of the
[
Dated:
L.S.
(
affix seal )
Judge or magistrate of the Court |
*
(7) In any proceeding in an Australian court:
(a) evidence given by a person in respect of which a certificate under this section has been given; and
(b) evidence of any information, document or thing obtained as a direct or indirect consequence of the person having given evidence;
cannot be used against the person. However, this does not apply to a criminal proceeding in respect of the falsity of the evidence.
Subsection 128A (8) of the
Evidence Act 1995 provides as follows:(8) In any proceeding in an Australian court:
(a) evidence of information disclosed by a relevant person in respect of which a certificate has been given under this section; and
(b) evidence of any information, document or thing obtained as a direct result or indirect consequence of the relevant person having disclosed that information;
cannot be used against the person. However, this does not apply to a criminal proceeding in respect of the falsity of the evidence concerned.
(regulation 8)
Affidavit of member of State or Territory police force concerning fingerprints
[
I, [
1. I am a fingerprint expert for the police force of [
State or Territory ].2. I have examined the fingerprint card marked for identification with the letter ‘A’.
3. I have compared the fingerprints shown on that card with the fingerprints shown on the fingerprint card in the records held by the police force of [
State or Territory ] showing the fingerprints of [name of person and alias, if any ].
4. The fingerprints on those cards are identical.
5. According to the records of the police force of [
State or Territory ], which I believe to be accurate, [name of person ] was convicted in that State*/Territory* of the following offences:6. Annexed to this affidavit and marked with the letters [
insert an alphabetical sequence of letters, commencing at ‘B’, corresponding to the number of annexures ], are certified copies or certificates of conviction for each of those convictions.7. From an examination of the records referred to above, I believe that the person referred to in each annexed certified copy or certificate as having been convicted of the offence stated in it is identical with the person whose fingerprints are shown on the fingerprint cards referred to in paragraph 3 of this affidavit.
SWORN*/AFFIRMED*
by the deponent at [
this day
of [
Before me:
( | ( |
A Justice of the Peace*/notary public*/lawyer*/person authorised to take affidavits in the Australian Capital Territory*. | Deponent |
|
(regulation 9)
Affidavit of member of Australian Federal Police concerning fingerprints
[
I, [
1. I am a fingerprint expert for the Australian Federal Police.
2. I have examined the fingerprint card marked for identification with the letter ‘A’.
3. I have compared the fingerprints shown on that card with the fingerprints shown on the fingerprint card in the records held by the Australian Federal Police showing the fingerprints of [
name of person and alias, if any ].4. The fingerprints on those cards are identical.
5. According to the records of the Australian Federal Police, which I believe to be accurate, [
name of person ] was convicted of the following offences against a law of the Commonwealth:6. Annexed to this affidavit, and marked with the letters [
insert an alphabetical sequence of letters, commencing at ‘B’, corresponding to the number of annexures ], are certified copies or certificates of conviction for each of those convictions.7. From an examination of the records referred to above, I believe that the person referred to in each annexed certified copy or certificate as having been convicted of the offence stated in it is identical with the person whose fingerprints are shown on the fingerprint cards referred to in paragraph 3 of this affidavit.
SWORN*/AFFIRMED*
by the deponent at [
this day
of [
Before me:
( | ( | |
A Justice of the Peace*/notary public*/lawyer*/person authorised to take affidavits in the Australian Capital Territory*. | Deponent | |
| ||
The
1995 No. 44 | 14 Mar 1995 | 18 Apr 1995 | |
1996 No. 202 | 17 Sept 1996 | 17 Sept 1996 | — |
1998 No. 17 | 25 Feb 1998 | 25 Feb 1998 | — |
2008 No. 257 | 18 Dec 2008 ( | 1 Jan 2009 ( | — |
2010 No. 17 | 3 Mar 2010 ( | 4 Mar 2010 | — |
2011 No. 227 | 16 Dec 2011 ( | 27 Dec 2011 | — |
am. = amended rep. = repealed rs. = repealed and substituted | |
R. 1......................................... | rs. 2008 No. 257 |
R. 3......................................... | am. 1998 No. 17; 2011 No. 227 |
R. 4......................................... | am. 1996 No. 202 |
rs. 2008 No. 257 | |
R. 5......................................... | am. 1998 No. 17 |
R. 6......................................... | am. 1998 No. 17; 2010 No. 17 |
R. 7......................................... | am. 2010 No. 17 |
R. 7A....................................... | ad. 2008 No. 257 |
am. 2010 No. 17 | |
R. 10....................................... | ad. 2008 No. 257 |
Schedule................................ | am. 2010 No. 17 |
0
0
0