Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012 (WA)

Western Australia

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure

Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Western Australia

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure

Legislation Amendment Act 2012

CONTENTS

Part 1 — Preliminary

1.	Short title	2
2.	Commencement	2
Part 2 — Amendments to the *Evidence Act 1906* about protection of confidential

communications given in professional confidential relationships, and protection of

journalists’ sources

3.	Act amended	3
4.	Heading replaced	3
5.	Sections 20A to 20M inserted	3

20A.	Terms used	3
20B.	Application of protection provisions (PCR)	4
20C.	Exclusion of evidence of protected
confidences	5
20D.	Loss of professional confidential
relationship protection: consent	7
20E.	Loss of professional confidential
relationship protection: misconduct	8
20F.	Ancillary orders	9
20G.	Terms used	10
20H.	Application of protection provisions
(journalists)	11

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Contents

20I.	Protection of identity of informants	11
20J.	Direction to give identifying evidence	11
20K.	Effect of misconduct as to directions	13
20L.	Identifying informant with consent	16
20M.	Ancillary orders	16

Part 3 — Amendments about further

protections under the Public

Interest Disclosure Act 2003

Division 1 — Preliminary

6.	Act amended	18
Division 2 — Amendments about injunctions

concerning reprisals

Section 15A inserted

15A.

Injunction or order

Division 3 — Amendments about relocation

Section 15B inserted

15B.

Relocation of public service employee

Division 4 — Amendments about anonymous

disclosure

9.	Section 5 amended	20
10.	Section 8 amended	20
11.	Section 10 amended	20
12.	Section 12 amended	21
13.	Section 16 amended	21
14.	Section 17 amended	21
Division 5 — Amendments about disclosure to

journalists

15.

Section 7A inserted

7A.

Disclosure to journalist

16.	Section 16 amended	22
17.	Section 18A inserted	23

18A.

Protections as to disclosure to journalist

Western Australia

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure

Legislation Amendment Act 2012

No. 31 of 2012

An Act to amend the Evidence Act 1906 and the Public Interest

Disclosure Act 2003.

[Assented to 2 October 2012]

The Parliament of Western Australia enacts as follows:

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 1	Preliminary
s. 1

Part 1 — Preliminary

1. Short title

This is the Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation

Amendment Act 2012.

2. Commencement

This Act comes into operation as follows —

(a)	Part 1 — on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent;
(b)	the rest of the Act — on a day fixed by proclamation, and different days may be fixed for different provisions.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 3

Part 2 — Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about

protection of confidential communications given in

professional confidential relationships, and protection

of journalists’ sources

3. Act amended

This Part amends the Evidence Act 1906.

4. Heading replaced

Delete the heading before section 19A and insert:

Protection of confidential communications given in

counselling concerning sexual assault

5. Sections 20A to 20M inserted

After section 19M insert:

Protection of confidential communications given in professional

confidential relationships

20A.

Terms used

(1)

In this section and in sections 20B to 20F —

confidant means a person to whom a communication is made in confidence and includes a journalist as defined in section 20G;

harm includes actual physical bodily harm, financial

loss, stress or shock, damage to reputation or emotional

or psychological harm, such as shame, humiliation and

fear;

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

protected confidence means a communication made by

a person in confidence to another person (the

confidant) —

(a)	in the course of a relationship in which the confidant was acting in a professional capacity; and
(b)	when the confidant was under an express or implied obligation not to disclose its contents, whether or not the obligation arises under law or can be inferred from the nature of the relationship between the person and the confidant;

protected confider, in relation to a protected

confidence, means the person who made the protected

confidence;

protected identity information means information

about, or enabling a person to ascertain, the identity of

the person who made a protected confidence;

protection provisions (PCR) means this section and

sections 20C to 20F.

(2)	For the purposes of the protection provisions (PCR), a communication may be made in confidence even if it is made in the presence of a third party if the third party’s presence is necessary to facilitate communication.

20B.

Application of protection provisions (PCR)

(1)

The protection provisions (PCR) do not apply in

relation to a proceeding the hearing of which began

before the commencement of those provisions.

(2)

The protection provisions (PCR) apply in relation to a protected confidence whether made before or after the commencement of those provisions.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

(3)	The protection provisions (PCR) do not apply in relation to matters that are the subject of the protection provisions as defined in section 19A(1).
(4)	The protection provisions (PCR) do not affect the law relating to legal professional privilege.
(5)	The protection provisions (PCR) do not affect the law relating to evidence of a confession made by a person to a member of the clergy in the member’s professional
capacity according to the ritual of the church or religious denomination concerned.
(6)	A court may give a direction under the protection provisions (PCR) in respect of a protected confidence or protected identity information whether or not the protected confidence or protected identity information is privileged or protected under another provision of this Act or would be so privileged or protected except for a limitation or restriction imposed by that provision.
(7)	The protection provisions (PCR) are not intended to exclude or limit the operation of section 5 or the power of a court under any other law of the State to take any action if it is in the interests of justice to do so.

20C.

Exclusion of evidence of protected confidences

(1)	A court may direct that evidence not be adduced in a proceeding if the court finds that adducing it would disclose —

(a) a protected confidence; or

(b)	the contents of a document recording a protected confidence; or

(2)	A court may give such a direction —

(a)	on its own initiative; or

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

(b)	on the application of the protected confider or confidant concerned, whether or not either is a party.

(3)	A court must give such a direction if it is satisfied that —

(a)	it is likely that harm would or might be caused, whether directly or indirectly, to the protected confider if the evidence is adduced; and
(b)	the nature, extent and likelihood of the harm outweigh the desirability of the evidence being given.

(4)	Without limiting the matters that a court may have regard to for the purposes of this section, it must have regard to the following matters —

(a)	the probative value of the evidence in the proceeding;
(b)	the importance of the evidence in the proceeding;
(c)	the nature and gravity of the relevant offence, cause of action or defence and the nature of the subject matter of the proceeding;
(d)	the availability of any other evidence concerning the matters to which the protected confidence or protected identity information relates;
(e)	the likely effect of adducing evidence of the protected confidence or protected identity information, including the likelihood of harm, and the nature and extent of harm that would be caused to the protected confider;
(f)	the means, including any ancillary orders that may be made under section 20F, available to the court to limit the harm or extent of the harm

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

that is likely to be caused if evidence of the

protected confidence or the protected identity

information is disclosed;

(g)	the likely effect of the evidence in relation to —

(i) a prosecution that has commenced but has not been finalised; or

(ii) an investigation, of which the court is aware, into whether or not an offence has been committed;

(h)	whether the substance of the protected confidence or the protected identity information has already been disclosed by the protected confider or any other person;

(i) the public interest in preserving the confidentiality of protected confidences;

(j)	the public interest in preserving the confidentiality of protected identity information.

(5)

A court must not give a direction under this section in a

proceeding for defamation concerning the publication

of alleged defamatory matter containing or relying on a

protected confidence unless the court is first satisfied

that the content of the protected confidence is true, and

if the court is so satisfied, subsections (3) and (4)

apply.

(6)

A court must state its reasons for giving or refusing to

give a direction under this section.

20D.

Loss of professional confidential relationship

protection: consent

The protection provisions (PCR) do not prevent the

giving or adducing of evidence with the consent of the

protected confider concerned.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

20E.

Loss of professional confidential relationship

protection: misconduct

(1)

In this section —

misconduct, in relation to a person (the confider) who

makes a communication in confidence to another

person, includes any of the following —

(a)	an offence committed by the confider;
(b)	an act or omission on the part of the confider that renders the confider liable to a civil penalty;
(c)	deceit, dishonesty, inappropriate partiality or a breach of trust on the part of the confider;
(d)	the confider acting corruptly, or corruptly failing to act, in any capacity;
(e)	the confider corruptly taking advantage of the confider’s position to obtain a benefit for the confider or another person or to cause a detriment to another person;
(f)	the confider engaging in conduct that adversely affects, or could adversely affect, directly or indirectly, the honest or impartial performance of the functions of any person in any capacity;
(g)	misuse, on the part of the confider, of information or material that the confider has acquired in any capacity, whether the misuse is to obtain a benefit for the confider or any other person or to cause a detriment to another person;
(h)	conduct providing reasonable grounds for the termination of the confider’s employment;
(i)

conduct providing reasonable grounds for unsatisfactory professional conduct or

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

professional misconduct, or the breach of a

professional standard, in relation to the

confider’s profession, whether or not the

confider is a member of the body that

prescribed the standard.

(2)

The protection provisions (PCR) do not prevent the

adducing of evidence of a communication made or the

contents of a document prepared in the furtherance of

misconduct by a person who makes a communication

in confidence to another person.

(3)

For the purposes of this section, if the misconduct is a

fact in issue and there are reasonable grounds for

believing that —

(a) the misconduct occurred; and

(b)	a communication was made or document prepared in furtherance of the misconduct,

the court may find that the communication was so

made or document so prepared.

20F.

Ancillary orders

Without limiting any action the court may take to limit

the possible harm, or extent of the harm, likely to be

caused by the disclosure of evidence of a protected

confidence or protected identity information, the court

may —

(a)

order that all or part of the evidence be heard in camera; and

(b)

make such orders relating to the suppression of publication of all or part of the evidence given before the court as, in its opinion, are necessary

to protect the safety and welfare of the

protected confider and are in the interests of

justice.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

Protection of identity of journalists’ informants

20G.	Terms used
In this section and in sections 20H to 20M —
*direction* means a direction under section 20J(1);
*identifying evidence* has the meaning given in section 20I;
*informant* means a person who gives information to a journalist in the normal course of the journalist’s work in the expectation that the information may be
published in a news medium;
*journalist* means a person engaged in the profession or occupation of journalism in connection with the publication of information in a news medium;
*national security* has the meaning that it has in the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 (Commonwealth) section 7;
*news medium* means a medium for the dissemination to the public or a section of the public of news and observations on news;
*person acting judicially* does not include a member of a House of Parliament or a Committee of a House, or both Houses, of Parliament who, by law, has authority to hear, receive, and examine evidence;
*proceeding* does not include a proceeding before either House of Parliament or a Committee of either House, or both Houses, of Parliament, in which evidence is or may be given;
*protection provisions (journalists)* means this section and sections 20I to 20M.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

20H.

Application of protection provisions (journalists)

(1)	The protection provisions (journalists) do not apply in relation to a proceeding the hearing of which began before the commencement of those provisions.
(2)	The protection provisions (journalists) apply in relation to information given by an informant whether given before or after the commencement of those provisions.
(3)	The protection provisions (journalists) apply to a person acting judicially in any proceeding even if the law by which the person has authority to hear, receive, and examine evidence provides that this Act does not apply to the proceeding.
(4)	The protection provisions (journalists) are not intended to exclude or limit the operation of section 5 or the power that a person acting judicially has under any other law of the State to take any action if it is in the interests of justice to do so.

20I.

Protection of identity of informants

If a journalist has promised an informant not to

disclose the informant’s identity, neither the journalist

nor a person for whom the journalist was working at

the time of the promise is compellable to give evidence

that would disclose the identity of the informant or

enable that identity to be ascertained (identifying

evidence).

20J.

Direction to give identifying evidence

(1)

Despite section 20I, a person acting judicially may

direct a person referred to in that section to give

identifying evidence.

(2)

A person acting judicially may give a direction only if

satisfied that, having regard to the issues to be

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

determined in the proceeding, the public interest in the

disclosure of the identity of the informant outweighs —

(a)	any likely adverse effect of the disclosure of the identity on the informant or any other person; and
(b)	the public interest in the communication of facts and opinions to the public by the news media and, accordingly also, in the ability of the news media to access sources of facts.

(3)	Without limiting the matters that a person acting judicially may have regard to for the purposes of this section, the person acting judicially must have regard to the following matters —

(a)	the probative value of the identifying evidence in the proceeding;
(b)	the importance of the identifying evidence in the proceeding;
(c)	the nature and gravity of the relevant offence, cause of action or defence and the nature of the subject matter of the proceeding;
(d)	the availability of any other evidence concerning the matters to which the identifying evidence relates;
(e)	the likely effect of the identifying evidence, including the likelihood of harm, and the nature and extent of harm that would be caused to the informant or any other person;
(f)	the means, including any ancillary orders that may be made under section 20M, available to the person acting judicially to limit the harm or
extent of the harm that is likely to be caused if the identifying evidence is given;

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

(g)	the likely effect of the identifying evidence in relation to —

(i) a prosecution that has commenced but has not been finalised; or

(ii) an investigation, of which the person acting judicially is aware, into whether or not an offence has been committed;

(h)	whether the substance of the identifying evidence has already been disclosed by the informant or any other person;

(i) the risk to national security or to the security of the State;

(j)	whether or not there was misconduct, as defined in section 20K(1), on the part of the informant or the journalist in relation to obtaining, using, giving or receiving information.

(4)	A person acting judicially must state the person’s reasons for giving or refusing to give a direction.

20K.

Effect of misconduct as to directions

(1)

In this section —

misconduct, in relation to an informant or a journalist,

includes any of the following —

(a)	an offence committed by the informant or journalist;
(b)	an act or omission on the part of the informant or journalist that renders him or her liable to a civil penalty;
(c)	deceit, dishonesty, inappropriate partiality or a breach of trust on the part of the informant or journalist;

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

(d)	the informant or journalist acting corruptly, or corruptly failing to act, in any capacity;
(e)	the informant or journalist corruptly taking advantage of his or her position to obtain a benefit for himself, herself or another person or

to cause a detriment to another person;

(f)	the informant or journalist engaging in conduct that adversely affects, or could adversely affect, directly or indirectly, the honest or impartial
performance of the functions of any person in any capacity;
(g)	misuse, on the part of the informant or journalist, of information or material that he or she has acquired in any capacity, whether the misuse is to obtain a benefit for himself, herself or another person or to cause a detriment to another person;
(h)	conduct providing reasonable grounds for the termination of the informant or journalist’s employment;

(i) conduct providing reasonable grounds for disciplining the informant or journalist in relation to unsatisfactory professional conduct

or professional misconduct, or the breach of a

professional standard, in relation to the

informant or journalist’s profession, whether or

not he or she is a member of the body that

prescribed the standard.

(2)	A person acting judicially who finds that there was misconduct on the part of an informant or a journalist in relation to obtaining, using, giving or receiving information —

(a)	may, but is not bound to, give a direction; and

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

(b)	must have regard to the principles set out in subsection (3) when deciding whether or not to give a direction.

(3)	The principles mentioned in subsection (2)(b) are as follows —

(a)	that generally a direction should be given if —

(i) the misconduct was the commission of an offence under The Criminal Code section 81 or a breach of a public sector standard, code of conduct or code of ethics, as those terms are defined in the Public Sector Management Act 1994 section 3(1); and

(ii)	disclosure of information that was

the offence or breach concerned the the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003 section 3(1); and

(iii) the information could have been, but was not, disclosed in accordance with the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003;

(b)	that generally a direction should be given if the information given to a journalist could have been provided, in a way that did not constitute misconduct, to another person to deal with the concern;
(c)	that generally a direction should be given if the information given to a journalist could have been obtained by the journalist under the Freedom of Information Act 1992 or by other lawful means;

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 2

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

(d)	that generally a direction should be given if the misconduct involved a breach of privacy that was not warranted in the circumstances, having regard to the value to be attached to —

(i) the privacy of information regarding private citizens generally; or

(ii) the privacy of information regarding matters which may be commercial in confidence; or

(iii) the principle of Cabinet confidentiality; or

(iv) the principle of public interest immunity;

(e)	that generally a direction should be given if a communication made to a journalist, if published, would give rise to a risk to national security or to the security of the State;
(f)	that it is otherwise in the public interest to give or refuse to give a direction.

(4)

For the purposes of this section, if the misconduct is a

fact in issue and there are reasonable grounds for

believing that there was misconduct on the part of the

informant or the journalist in relation to obtaining,

using, giving or receiving information, the person

acting judicially in the proceeding may so find.

20L.	Identifying informant with consent
The protection provisions (journalists) do not prevent the giving or adducing of identifying evidence with the informant’s consent.
20M.	Ancillary orders
Without limiting any action the person acting judicially may take to limit the possible harm, or extent of the

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments to the Evidence Act 1906 about protection of

Part 2

confidential communications given in professional confidential

relationships, and protection of journalists’ sources

s. 5

harm, likely to be caused by identifying evidence, the

person acting judicially may —

(a)

order that all or part of the evidence be heard in camera; and

(b)

make such orders relating to the suppression of publication of all or part of the evidence given before the person acting judicially as, in the

opinion of the person acting judicially, are

necessary to protect the informant’s safety and

welfare and are in the interests of justice.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 3

Amendments about further protections under the Public

Interest Disclosure Act 2003

Division 1

Preliminary

s. 6

Part 3 — Amendments about further protections

under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003

Division 1 — Preliminary

6. Act amended

This Part amends the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003.

Division 2 — Amendments about injunctions

concerning reprisals

7. Section 15A inserted

After section 14 insert:

15A.

Injunction or order

(1)

A person who believes that detrimental action has been taken or may be taken against him or her in reprisal for a disclosure of public interest information under this

Act may apply to the Supreme Court for an order or injunction under this section.

(2)

If the Supreme Court, on an application under

subsection (1), is satisfied that a person has taken or

intends to take detrimental action against the applicant

in reprisal for a disclosure of public interest

information under this Act, the Court may —

(a)	order the person who took the detrimental action to remedy that action; or
(b)	grant an injunction in any terms the Court considers appropriate.

(3)	The Supreme Court, pending the final determination of an application under subsection (1), may —

(a)	make an interim order in the terms of subsection (2)(a); or

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments about further protections under the Public

Part 3

Interest Disclosure Act 2003

Amendments about relocation

Division 3

s. 8

(b) grant an interim injunction.

Division 3 — Amendments about relocation

8. Section 15B inserted

Before section 15 insert:

15B.

Relocation of public service employee

(1)	In this section —
*employing authority, in relation to a public service employee, means that person’s employing authority under the Public Sector Management Act 1994*
section 5;
*public service employee* means —

(a)	a public service officer; or
(b)	an employee employed in an organisation;

organisation means an organisation as defined in the

Public Sector Management Act 1994 section 3(1).

(2)	A public service employee may apply in writing to his or her employing authority for relocation on the grounds that —

(a)	detrimental action has been taken or may be taken against the employee in reprisal for a disclosure of public interest information under

this Act; and

(b)	the only practical means of removing or substantially removing the danger of a reprisal is to relocate the employee.

(3)	If the employing authority is satisfied that the grounds are established it must, as far as practicable, make arrangements to relocate the employee away from the

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 3	Amendments about further protections under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003
Division 4	Amendments about anonymous disclosure
s. 9
employee’s existing work location whether within the employee’s current department or organisation or to another department or organisation.

(4)	Subsection (3) does not authorise the relocation of a public service employee unless the employee consents to the specific arrangements proposed by the employing authority.

Division 4 — Amendments about anonymous disclosure

9. Section 5 amended

After section 5(5) insert:

(6A)	A person may make a disclosure of public interest information anonymously.

10. Section 8 amended

After section 8(3) insert:

(4)	Subsection (3) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.

11. Section 10 amended

After section 10(4) insert:

(5)	Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (4) do not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments about further protections under the Public

Part 3

Interest Disclosure Act 2003

Amendments about disclosure to journalists

Division 5

s. 12

12. Section 12 amended

After section 12(4) insert:

(5A)	Subsection (4)(b) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.

13. Section 16 amended

After section 16(2) insert:

(3A)	Subsection (2) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.

14. Section 17 amended

After section 17(1) insert:

(2A)	Subsection (1)(a) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.

Division 5 — Amendments about disclosure to journalists

15. Section 7A inserted

At the end of Part 2 Division 1 insert:

7A.

Disclosure to journalist

(1)

In this section —

journalist means a person engaged in the profession or

occupation of journalism in connection with the

publication of information in a medium for the

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Part 3	Amendments about further protections under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003
Division 5	Amendments about disclosure to journalists
s. 16
dissemination to the public or a section of the public of news and observations on news.

(2)

A person may make a disclosure to a journalist of

substantially the same information that was the subject

of a disclosure of public interest information that the

person has already made under this Act if the proper

authority to which the disclosure was made, or the

person to whom a matter raised by the disclosure was

referred under section 9(1)(b) —

(a)	has refused to investigate, or has discontinued the investigation of, a matter raised by the disclosure; or
(b)	has not completed an investigation of a matter raised by the disclosure within the period ending 6 months after the disclosure was made; or
(c)	has completed an investigation of a matter raised by the disclosure but has not recommended the taking of action in respect of the matter; or
(d)	has not complied with section 10(1) or (4), if applicable, in relation to the disclosure.

16. Section 16 amended

(1)	After section 16(1)(c) insert:

(d)	the disclosure is made in accordance with an order of a court or any other person or body having authority to hear, receive and examine

evidence; or

Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012

Amendments about further protections under the Public

Part 3

Interest Disclosure Act 2003

Amendments about disclosure to journalists

Division 5

s. 17

(2)	After section 16(3)(d) insert:

(e)	the disclosure is made in accordance with an order of a court or any other person or body having authority to hear, receive and examine

evidence; or

17. Section 18A inserted

At the end of Part 3 insert:

18A.

Protections as to disclosure to journalist

A person who makes a disclosure to a journalist in

accordance with section 7A(2) is, for the purposes of

this Part, to be taken to be a person who makes a

disclosure of public interest information.