Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Wallis Nominees (Computing) Pty Ltd v Pickett
[2013] VSCA 24
Citation 1
(Para 14)
…288. 30Restraint clauses are interpreted strictly, as set out by the Court of Appeal in the decision of Wallis Nominees (Computing) Pty Ltd v Pickett [2013] VSCA 24 at [14]. A contractual provision in restraint of trade is prima facie void. The presumption can be rebutted by the special circumstances of a particu…
-
Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor engineering Co Pty Ltd
[1973] HCA 40
Citation 2
…iciary of the restraint, whilst at the same time not being injurious to the public: Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Co Pty Ltd (1973) 133 CLR 288. 30Restraint clauses are interpreted strictly, as set out by the Court of Appeal in the decision of Wallis Nominees (Computing) Pty Ltd v Pickett [20…
-
Australian Cardiology Services Pty Ltd v Rudd
[2020] VSC 645
Citation 3
…bmits that the orders sought are substantially the same as those in Australian Cardiology Services Pty Ltd v Rudd [2020] VSC 645 ( Rudd ) and relies on that case. But the evidence relied on here is quite different to that in Rudd . There, there was substantial evidence from many patients of their medical records…
-
Epichealth Pty Ltd v Yang
[2015] VSC 516
Citation 4
…unt to solicitation. I take into account that the concept of solicitation can be very broad (see Dixon J in Epichealth Pty Ltd v Yang [2015] VSC 516 about the breadth of the concept of solicitation at [36]). But I do not accept that a doctor announcing on his Facebook page (that happens to have some patients join…