Evans and Australian Capital Territory (Compensation) [2019] AATA 799 (17 April 2019)
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
)General Division )
File Numbers: 2016/2524, 2018/6499, 2018/6587, 2018/6588, 2018/6589, 2018/6590, 2018/6591
Re: Timothy Evans
Applicant
And: Australian Capital Territory
RespondentDIRECTION
TRIBUNAL: Mr S Webb, Member
DATE OF CORRIGENDUM: 3 May 2019
PLACE: Canberra
The Tribunal directs the Registrar, pursuant to subsection 43AA(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, to alter the text of the decision in this application:
1. On the cover page of the decision made by Mr S Webb, Member dated 17 April 2019 be amended to show the ‘Australian Capital Territory’ as the Respondent in place of ‘Comcare’.
2. Where the Respondent is referred to as ‘Comcare’ in paragraphs 106 and 107, it be amended to show the ‘Australian Capital Territory’.
...................................................................
Mr S Webb, Member
Division:GENERAL DIVISION
File Number(s):2016/2524
2018/6499
2018/6587
2018/6588
2018/6589
2018/6590
2018/6591
Re:Timothy Evans
APPLICANT
AndComcare
RESPONDENT
Decision
Tribunal:Mr S. Webb, Member
Date:17 April 2019
Place:Canberra
Applications dismissed.
........................................................................
Mr S. Webb, Member
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for review of decisions rejecting compensation claims – delay – failure to comply with directions – failure to proceed – application for dismissal – meaning of ‘within a reasonable time’ - discretion enlivened – factors relevant to exercise of discretion - explanation for applicant’s failure to proceed and comply – fairness – prejudice - flexibility and latitude in the context of properly determined procedure - serial non-compliance and failure to proceed by applicant - Tribunal objectives – consideration of appropriate procedure – application dismissed
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, s 2A, 33, 39, 42A, 42B
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988, s 5A, 5B, 14
AMF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 68
Andelman v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2011] FCA 299
Beard v Telstra Corporation Ltd [1999] FCA 999
Goldie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 367
Khan and National Australia Bank Limited [2018] AATA 4094
Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28
Topalides and Tax Practitioners Board [2014] AATA 470
REASONS FOR DECISION
Mr S. Webb, Member
17 April 2019
Timothy Evans was physically injured in his employment as a physical education teacher by the ACT Department of Education. He claimed and was paid compensation. The physical injury prevented him from engaging in physical activities he had previously enjoyed. Some time later, he experienced psychological symptoms, including depression. Initially, Comcare denied liability for this ailment, but this determination was later revoked and he was paid compensation for resulting incapacity and medical treatment expenses.
Mr Evans returned to work and was transferred to a different school. This transfer did not go well – he complained of difficulties involving the school principal and other staff. His mental health was affected. He lodged a further claim for compensation. Comcare decided to reject the claim by primary determination…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Evans and Australian Capital Territory (Compensation) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] AATA 799
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The core legal issue before the tribunal was whether, in light of the particular circumstances of the case, it was appropriate to dismiss Mr Evans' applications.
The tribunal considered various factors, including considerations of fairness and other relevant matters. After balancing these competing considerations, the tribunal concluded that the specific circumstances of Mr Evans' case warranted the dismissal of his applications.
Consequently, the tribunal ordered that Mr Evans' applications be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.