| [2020] FWCA 5395 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Euro Formwork Australia Constructions Pty Ltd
(AG2020/2841)
EURO FORMWORK AUSTRALIA CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020 – 2024
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 14 OCTOBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Euro Formwork Australia Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 - 2024.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Euro Formwork Australia Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 - 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Euro Formwork Australia Constructions Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On 22 September 2020 the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) contacted the Commission and requested that it be provided with documentation in relation to the Agreement. In accordance with its usual practice my Chambers did so on 12 October 2020. In this email my Chambers indicated that I was inclined to approve the Agreement. On 14 October 2020, the CFMEU advised that it had no comments it would like to make in respect of the application.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 October 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 October 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509207 PR723438>
- AGLC
- Euro Formwork Australia Constructions Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 5395
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 5395
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission had to decide included whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, including the mandatory terms and conditions set out in the Code of Fair Trading. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The respondents argued that the agreement did not provide adequate protections for employees and that it failed to comply with the mandatory terms and conditions of the Code.
In determining the matter, the Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and that it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the mandatory terms and conditions of the Code and that it did not contain any terms that were contrary to public policy. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications that were made to address the respondents' concerns. The applicants were ordered to implement the modified agreement, and the respondents were ordered to withdraw their objections.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.