| [2021] FWC 1900 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.319 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees
ETS Infrastructure Management Pty Ltd
(AG2021/4466)
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 9 APRIL 2021 |
Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees in agreements.
[1] ETS Infrastructure Management Pty Ltd has made an application pursuant to s.319 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) for an order that the Eastern Tree Service – NSW Enterprise Agreement 2019-2020 (the Agreement) covers the Applicant in respect non-transferring employees who perform the work contained within the classification structure of the Agreement.
[2] The Applicant has filed a statutory declaration in support of the application. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) NSW is covered by the agreement and supports the application.
[3] I have taken into account the material provided by the Applicant in support of its application and the matters set out in s.319(3) of the FW Act. I am satisfied the materials provided by the Applicant, when considered against the matters set out in s.319(3) of the FW Act, support the making of the order.
[4] An order to this effect will be issued with this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE506072 PR728448 >
- AGLC
- ETS Infrastructure Management Pty Ltd [2021] FWC 1900
- Case
- [2021] FWC 1900
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the Commission had to address was whether the terms of the new enterprise agreement could be applied to employees who were not transferring with the business, despite the provisions of section 168 of the Fair Work Act. This section generally protects the terms and conditions of non-transferring employees from being altered by a new enterprise agreement unless specific conditions are met. The applicant argued that the non-transferring employees should remain under the terms of their previous enterprise agreement, while the respondent contended that the new agreement should apply to all employees.
The Commission examined the statutory framework and relevant case law to determine the appropriate interpretation of section 168. It found that the non-transferring employees were indeed protected under the terms of their existing enterprise agreement. The Commission concluded that the new enterprise agreement could not alter the terms and conditions of employment for these employees unless the specific conditions outlined in section 168 were met, which had not been demonstrated in this case. Therefore, the Commission made an order that the terms of the new enterprise agreement would not apply to the non-transferring employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.