Essential Energy

[2013] FWCA 9535

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Essential Energy
(AG2013/10190)

ESSENTIAL ENERGY FAR WEST (ELECTRICITY) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Electrical power industry
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER	SYDNEY, 4 DECEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Essential Energy Far West (Electricity) Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Essential Energy Far West (Electricity) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 11 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Essential Energy applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Essential Energy Far West (Electricity) Enterprise Agreement 2013. The applicant was an electricity distribution business and the agreement was to apply to its employees. The Commission was required to determine whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute arose when the relevant union objected to the agreement on the basis that it did not provide for adequate minimum rates of pay and did not sufficiently provide for the protection of employees' wages.

The Commission found that the agreement did not provide for adequate minimum rates of pay, nor did it sufficiently protect employees' wages. The Commission also found that the agreement did not provide for adequate mechanisms for resolving disputes between employees and the employer. The Commission determined that the agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and did not approve it.

The Commission noted that the agreement did not provide for adequate minimum rates of pay for employees, and did not sufficiently protect employees' wages. The Commission found that the agreement did not provide for adequate mechanisms for resolving disputes between employees and the employer. The Commission also noted that the agreement did not provide for adequate provisions for employee health and safety. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and did not approve it.

The Commission did not make any orders in relation to the approval of the agreement.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established