Epworth Foundation T/A Epworth HealthCare

Case

[2017] FWCA 6092

20 NOVEMBER 2017


[2017] FWCA 6092

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

decision

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Epworth Foundation T/A Epworth HealthCare

(AG2017/4539)

Epworth HealthCare Dietitians, Psychologists, Medical Scientists and Medical Physicists Enterprise Agreement 2017-2021

Health and welfare services

Deputy President Colman

MELBOURNE, 20 NOVEMBER 2017

Application for approval of the Epworth HealthCare Dietitians, Psychologists, Medical Scientists and Medical Physicists Enterprise Agreement 2017-2021.

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Epworth HealthCare Dietitians, Psychologists, Medical Scientists and Medical Physicists Enterprise Agreement 2017-2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Epworth Foundation T/A Epworth HealthCare. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Health Services Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement was approved on and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 November 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE426148  PR597872>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0