Environmental Protection Amendment Regulations 2000 (WA)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

7 July 2000] GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 3677

— PART 1 —

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

EP301*

Environmental Protection Act 1986

Environmental Protection Amendment

Regulations 2000

Made by the Administrator in Executive Council on the recommendation of the Environmental Protection Authority.

1.             Citation

These regulations may be cited as the Environmental Protection
Amendment Regulations 2000.

2.             The regulations amended

The amendments in these regulations are to the Environmental
Protection Regulations 1987*.
[* Reprinted as at 2 April 1999.

For amendments to 2 June 2000 see 1999 Index to

Legislation of Western Australia, Table 4, p. 70.]

[* Reprinted as at 2 April 1999.]

3.             Part 8 inserted

After regulation 16 the following Part is inserted —

Part 8 — Monitoring sulphur dioxide levels in

the Goldfields residential areas

17.           Interpretation

In this Part, unless the contrary intention appears —

“approved monitoring equipment” means

monitoring equipment that has been approved by the Chief Executive Officer under regulation 20F;

“significant industrial source” has the same

definition as it has in clause 8(2) of the Policy;

3678 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA [7 July 2000

“specified monitoring programme” means a

monitoring programme specified by the Chief

Executive Officer in a works approval or licence;

“the Policy” means the Environmental Protection

(Goldfields Residential Areas) (Sulphur Dioxide)

in the Schedule to that Order,

Policy 1992 approved under the Environmental
Protection (Goldfields Residential Areas) (Sulphur

and unless the contrary intention appears, other words
and expressions have the same respective definitions as
they have in the Policy.

18.           Prescribed licence conditions for certain industrial premises

There is prescribed for the purposes of section 62(1)(h) of the Act as a condition of a works approval or licence in relation to any premises on which there is a

significant industrial source the following
conditions —
(a) that monitoring equipment used for the purposes of a works approval or licence or a specified monitoring programme is to be approved monitoring equipment;
(b) any measurement taken for the purpose of the works approval or licence or a specified monitoring programme is to be taken with approved monitoring equipment.

19.           Approved monitoring equipment to be used in specified monitoring programme

A person who —

(a)

is required by a works approval or licence to carry out a specified monitoring programme with approved monitoring equipment; and

(b)

does not use approved monitoring equipment for the purpose of carrying out that monitoring programme,

commits an offence.
Penalty: $5 000.

20.           Duty to ensure that approved monitoring equipment is accurate

(1) A person who —

(a)

is required by a works approval or licence to carry out a specified monitoring programme with approved monitoring equipment; and

7 July 2000] GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 3679
(b) does not ensure that any approved monitoring equipment used in that monitoring programme is operating so as to give measurements that are

accurate,

commits an offence.

Penalty: $5 000.

(2) It is a defence to proceedings for an offence under
subregulation (1) if the person charged with that
offence proves that the person took reasonable
precautions and exercised due diligence to prevent the
commission of the offence.
20A. Duty to comply with conditions of approval of
monitoring equipment
(1) A person who —

(a)

is required by a works approval or licence to carry out a specified monitoring programme with approved monitoring equipment; and

(b)

does not comply with a condition imposed under regulation 20G,

commits an offence.

Penalty: $5 000.

(2) It is a defence to proceedings for an offence under
subregulation (1) if the person charged with that
offence proves that the person took reasonable
precautions and exercised due diligence to prevent the
commission of the offence.
20B. Report on results of specified monitoring
programme
(1) The Chief Executive Officer may by notice require a
person required by a works approval or licence to carry
out a specified monitoring programme to report to the
Chief Executive Officer on the matters referred to in
subregulation (2) at periods or on dates specified in the
notice.
(2) The report under subregulation (1) is to —
(a) contain details of the measurements taken using
approved monitoring equipment or other

monitoring programme;

(b) state whether or not any inaccuracy in those measurements is known to the person making the report;
(c) if an inaccuracy in those measurements is known —

(i)      state the extent of the inaccuracy known to the person making the report;

3680 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA [7 July 2000

(ii)      state any cause of the inaccuracy known to the person making the report.

(3) A person given notice under subregulation (1) is to
comply with the requirements in that notice.
Penalty: $5 000.
20C. Presumption of accuracy of measurements

A measurement taken by approved monitoring equipment is to be taken to be correct in the absence of proof, on the balance of probability, to the contrary.

20D. Presumption of accuracy of contents of report

A statement in a report as to the results of a specified monitoring programme made under section 62(3) of the Act or regulation 20B detailing the measurements that were taken using approved monitoring equipment is to be taken to be evidence that those measurements were taken by the monitoring equipment in the absence of proof, on the balance of probability, to the contrary.

20E. Notification of inaccurate measurement
A person who has submitted a report under
regulation 20B who becomes aware that a measurement
referred to in the report is inaccurate must, as soon as
practicable after discovering the inaccuracy, report to
the Chief Executive Officer the extent, and cause, of
the inaccuracy which is known to the person making
the report.
Penalty: $5 000.
20F. Approval of monitoring equipment
(1) A person may apply to the Chief Executive Officer for
monitoring equipment to be used in a specified
monitoring programme to monitor —
(a) sulphur dioxide levels in the atmosphere; or
(b) meteorological data,

to be approved.

(2) An application for approval of monitoring equipment is
to be in a form approved by the Chief Executive
Officer unless the Chief Executive Officer approves an
application being made by telephone or other electronic
means.
(3) If a person applies to the Chief Executive Officer for
monitoring equipment to be approved, the Chief
Executive Officer may —
(a) require the applicant to provide more

grant the approval;

7 July 2000] GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 3681
(b) refuse to grant the approval; or
(c) grant the approval.
(4) Within 60 days of the making of the application the
Chief Executive Officer is to —

(i)      determine the application; and

(ii) if the application is refused, provide the
person who applied for the approval

refusing the application;

(iii)      if the application is granted, issue a certificate of approval to the applicant.

(5)

A certificate of the Chief Executive Officer stating that monitoring equipment is or is not approved monitoring equipment is conclusive proof of that fact.

20G. Conditions of approval of monitoring equipment
If monitoring equipment is approved under
regulation 20F, that approval is subject to the following
conditions —

(a)

the equipment is to be calibrated in accordance with any of the following standards as the Chief Executive Officer may specify in writing —

(i) the standards specified by the
manufacturer of the equipment;

(ii)      an Australian standard;

(iii)      an international standard; and

(b)

the equipment is to be operated in accordance with such quality assurance programme as the Chief Executive Officer may specify in writing.

20H. Revocation of approval
(1) The Chief Executive Officer may revoke an approval
under regulation 20F if, in the Chief Executive
Officer’s opinion —
(a) the equipment referred to in the certificate of approval is not considered to be suitable to be used in a specified monitoring programme;
(b) the equipment referred to in the certificate of

measurements; or

(c) a person has, in relation to an application under regulation 20F(1), provided information in written or oral form that the person knew, or could reasonably be expected to have known, to be —

(i)      false or misleading in a material particular; or

3682 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA [7 July 2000

(ii)      likely to deceive in a material way.

(2) The Chief Executive Officer may revoke an approval
of approved monitoring equipment if —
(a) that equipment has not been calibrated or

imposed under regulation 20G; and

(b)

in the opinion of the Chief Executive Officer, that failure to comply with the condition could have materially affected the accuracy of the equipment or the reliability of the results obtained from that equipment.

(3)

A revocation of an approval under regulation 20F is not effective unless the Chief Executive Officer has caused written notice of the intention to revoke the approval to be served personally or by post on the person who

obtained the approval stating the grounds on which the
revocation is to be made and has allowed the person
21 days to provide reasons as to why the Chief
Executive Officer should not revoke the approval.
(4) The Chief Executive Officer must set out in the written
notice referred to in subregulation (3) the reasons for
the revocation of the approval.
20I. Appeal

(1)

A person who is aggrieved by a decision of the Chief Executive Officer under regulation 20F, 20G, or 20H may within 21 days after the day on which the person is

notified of the decision lodge with the Minister an
appeal in writing setting out the grounds of the appeal.
(2) An appeal lodged under subregulation (1) is to be
treated as if it were an appeal under section 102 of the
Act, and for that purpose sections 106 to 110 of the Act
apply as if the appeal were an appeal under section 102.
20J. Approval of monitoring equipment pending
determination of appeal
(1) If —
(a) an appeal has been lodged under

revoked under regulation 20H; and

(b)

the Chief Executive Officer has entered into an agreement in writing with the licensee as to the interim monitoring measures to be adopted by

the licensee pending the determination of the
appeal,

until 60 days after the determination of the appeal, or
such other time as is agreed in writing by the Chief
Executive Officer and the licensee, any monitoring

7 July 2000] GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 3683

equipment used in accordance with that agreement is to

be taken to be approved monitoring equipment.

(2)

A certificate issued by the Chief Executive Officer stating that monitoring equipment specified in the certificate has or has not been used in accordance with

an agreement referred to in subregulation (1)(b) is, in the absence of proof on the balance of probability to the contrary, evidence of that fact.

(3)

In this regulation, a reference to the licensee is a reference to a person who is required by a works approval or a licence to carry out a specified

monitoring programme with approved monitoring
equipment.
20K. Judicial notice of signature of the Chief Executive
Officer

Judicial notice is to be taken of the signature of the be issued under regulation 20F(5) or 20J(2).

20L. Review of this Part
(1) The Authority is to report to the Minister on the
operation and effectiveness of this Part within
24 months after its commencement.
(2) The report is to be made after —

(a)

the public has been given an opportunity to make submissions on the operation and effectiveness of the Part; and

(b)

a reasonable endeavour has been made to obtain the views of public authorities and persons that appear to the Authority to be significantly affected by the Part.

(3) As soon as is practicable after the preparation of the
report the Minister is to cause it to be laid before each
House of Parliament.

”.

Recommended by the Environmental Protection Authority.

B. BOWEN, Chairman.

By Command of the Administrator,

ROD SPENCER, Clerk of the Executive Council.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0