Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Order amending Environmental Planning and Assessment Model Provisions 1980 (1994-635) [GG No 167 of 9.12.1994] (NSW)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

1994—No. 635

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT

1979—ORDER

NEW SOUTH WALES

[Published in Gazette No. 167 of 9 December 1994]

I, the Minister for Planning, in pursuance of section 33 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, make the order set out in the following Schedule.

ROBERT WEBSTER MLC

Minister for Planning.

Sydney, 6 December 1994.

SCHEDULE

Commencement

1. This order takes effect on and from 16 December 1994.

Amendment of Environmental Planning and Assessment Model
Provisions 1980

2. The Environmental Planning and Assessment Model Provisions 1980 are amended by omitting clause 8 (6) and by inserting instead the following subclause:

(6) It is a sufficient defence to proceedings under this clause relating to

the ring-barking, cutting down, topping, lopping, removal, injury or
wilful destruction of a tree to prove:

(a) that the tree was dying or dead or had become dangerous; or

(b)

that taking the action was reasonably necessary to protect human life, buildings or other property from imminent danger from a bush fire burning in the vicinity of the land on which the tree was situated; or

1994—No. 635

(c) that written notice about the proposed action was given to the council of the area in which the tree was situated and the council, before the action was taken, confirmed in writing:

(i)  that the tree was in a fuel free zone within the meaning of the document entitled “Planning for Bush Fire Protection” published by the Department of Bush Fire Services; and

(ii)  that, if the council has classified species of trees as being likely to present a significant fire hazard, the tree was of such a species; or

(d) that written notice about the proposed action was given to that council, a period of not less than 14 days occurred after the notice

was given (and before the action was taken) and the council did

not advise the person during that period that it opposed the action
being taken.

In this subclause, “notice” means a notice that includes the name and address of the person who gives it and that explains that a tree of a named species situated in a specified position on land described in the notice is intended to be ring-barked, cut down, topped, lopped, removed, injured or wilfully destroyed for the purpose of bush fire hazard reduction.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0