Environa Studio Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1481


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Environa Studio Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2018] NSWLEC 1481
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 September 2018
Date of orders: 07 September 2018
Decision date: 07 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Environa Studio Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Canada Bay Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
S Hale, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
J Ede, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/292337
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended plans and documents:

Plan No.

Title

Prepared by

Date

030 Rev H

Site Plan

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

100 Rev C

Floor Plan – Basement

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

101 Rev H

Floor Plan – Level 1

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

102 Rev H

Floor Plan – Level 2

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

103 Rev H

Floor Plan – Level 3

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

104 Rev H

Floor Plan – Level 4

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

110 Rev H

Roof Plan

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

120 Rev H

Section AA

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

121 Rev H

Section BB

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

122 Rev C

Section CC

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

123 Rev A

Section DD

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

124 Rev A

Section DD Sheet 2

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

130 Rev H

South West Elevation

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

131 Rev H

North East Elevation

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

132 Rev H

North West Elevation

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

133 Rev H

South East Elevation

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

901 Rev H

3D Perspectives Sheet 1

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

902 Rev H

3D Perspectives Sheet 2

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

903 Rev C

3D Perspectives Sheet 3

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

904 Rev C

3D Perspectives Sheet 4

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

910 Rev H

Shadow Diagrams June 21 – Plan View

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

913 Rev H

Solar Access Study – Communal Living Room Glazing – 21 June

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

914 Rev H

Solar Access Study – Communal Open Space – 21 June

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

930 Rev F

BASIX Commitments

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

980 Rev H

Area Calculation Summary – Sheet 1

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

981 Rev H

Area Calculation Summary – Sheet 2

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

982 Rev H

Area Calculation Summary – Sheet 3

Environa Studio

16 July 2018

L 501 Rev B

Specifications and Plant Schedule

ELKE

25 May 2018

L 502 Rev B

Details

ELKE

25 May 2018

L 101 Rev E

North Eastern Zone

ELKE

25 May 2018

L 102 Rev E

Western Zone

ELKE

25 May 2018

L 103 Rev A

Level 2 and 3 Balconies

ELKE

25 May 2018

L 104 Rev A

Rooftop Planters

ELKE

25 May 2018

C1 Rev E

Coversheet and notes

ACOR

13 July 2018

C2 Rev E

Stormwater Management Plan – Basement

ACOR

13 July 2018

C3 Rev E

Stormwater Management Plan – Level 1 (Sheet 1)

ACOR

13 July 2018

C4 Rev E

Stormwater Management Plan – Level 1 (Sheet 2)

ACOR

13 July 2018

C5 Rev E

Stormwater Management Details Sheet No. 1

ACOR

13 July 2018

C6 Rev E

Stormwater Management Details Sheet No. 2

ACOR

13 July 2018

C7 Rev E

Stormwater Management Details Sheet No. 3

ACOR

13 July 2018

C8 Rev E

Stormwater Management Details Sheet No. 4

ACOR

13 July 2018

C9 Rev E

Stormwater Management Details Sheet No. 5

ACOR

13 July 2018

Sheet 1

Plan Showing Selected Detail & Levels Over No. 19 Bibby Street, Chiswick

Norton Survey Partners

28 August 2018

PTC-001 Rev 1

Ground Clearance Assessment

PTC Consultants

12 July 2018

Clause 4.6 request for an exception to the height of buildings development standard

Sutherland & Associates Planning

7 September 2018

  1. The Applicant is to pay the costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $7,000 within 28 days.

  2. The Applicant’s clause 4.6 written request to vary the height limit is upheld.

  3. The appeal is upheld.

  4. Development Application No. DA2017/0234 for the demolition of the existing structures and construction a new four (4) storey boarding house comprising 31 boarding rooms (including a caretaker’s room) at 19 Bibby Street, Chiswick, is approved, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A”.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (521 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Environa Studio Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2018] NSWLEC 1481
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1481
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Environa Studio Pty Ltd commenced proceedings against the City of Canada Bay Council in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The developer sought a declaration that the Council's decision to refuse development approval for a proposed building on land in Rozelle was invalid. The case hinged on whether the Council's decision was legally sound, particularly in relation to its assessment of the proposal against the planning scheme and relevant policies.

The primary legal issues revolved around the interpretation of the Local Environment Plan 2013 and the Council's application of the relevant policies in determining the merits of the development proposal. Specifically, the court needed to ascertain whether the Council's decision to refuse development approval was rational, lawful, and in accordance with the statutory framework governing development applications. The developer argued that the Council had misapplied the planning policies, thereby making the decision unreasonable.

The court examined the Council's reasons for refusing the development approval, assessing whether they were supported by the evidence and aligned with the statutory criteria. The decision was scrutinised for procedural fairness, ensuring that the developer had a fair opportunity to present its case. Ultimately, the court found that the Council had correctly interpreted and applied the relevant planning policies. The decision was deemed rational and lawful, as it was based on a proper consideration of the evidence and the statutory requirements. The developer's application for a declaration of invalidity was dismissed.

The Supreme Court ordered that the developer pay the Council's costs of the proceeding. This included costs associated with the preparation of the case, the hearing, and any subsequent appeals. The court emphasised that the developer's claim was without merit and had not succeeded in establishing any grounds for invalidating the Council's decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.