Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd T/A Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd

Case

[2019] FWCA 8658

23 DECEMBER 2019

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2019] FWCA 8658
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd T/A Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/4832)

ENVAR ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PTY LTD BHPB IRON ORE GROWTH PROJECTS STAGE 1 AMWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT

Electrical contracting industry

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 23 DECEMBER 2019

Application for termination of the Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd BHPB Iron Ore Growth Projects Stage 1 AMWU Greenfields Agreement.

[1] This decision concerns an application made by Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd T/A Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for the termination of the Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd BHPB Iron Ore Growth Projects Stage 1 AMWU Greenfields Agreement (the Agreement).

[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

[5] The Applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Mr Joe Burmaz (Mr Burmaz) the General Manager of the Applicant.

[6] Mr Burmaz explains that the Agreement had a nominal expiry date on 13 December 2015, and that no employee is covered by the Agreement.

[7] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) was invited to provide its view on the application and did not object to the termination.

[8] The Applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.

Consideration

[9] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

[10] Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the Applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, which has not been challenged by the AMWU, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[11] Accordingly, the Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd BHPB Iron Ore Growth Projects Stage 1 AMWU Greenfields Agreement is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE897073  PR715531>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0