Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd T/A Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd

[2020] FWCA 360

[2020] FWCA 360

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement

Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd T/A Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/4834)

ENVAR ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PTY LTD BHPB IRON ORE GROWTH PROJECTS STAGE 1 CEPU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT

Electrical contracting industry
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS	PERTH, 23 JANUARY 2020

Application for termination of the Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd BHPB Iron Ore Growth Projects Stage 1 CEPU Greenfields Agreement.

[1] This decision concerns an application made by Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd T/A Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for the termination of the Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd BHPB Iron Ore Growth Projects Stage 1 CEPU Greenfields Agreement (the Agreement).

[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.

“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[5] The Applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Mr Joe Burmaz (Mr Burmaz), who is the General Manager of the Applicant.

[6] Mr Burmaz explains the Agreement has passed its nominal expiry, and there are no employees covered by the Agreement.

[7] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) were invited to provide its view on the application. The CEPU advised Chambers in writing that it did not object to the termination of the Agreement.

[8] The Applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.

Consideration

[9] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

[10] Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the Applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, which has not been challenged by the CEPU, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[11] Accordingly, the Envar Engineers and Contractors Pty Ltd BHPB Iron Ore Growth Projects Stage 1 CEPU Greenfields Agreement is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE897067  PR716127>