Entertainment and Broadcasting Industry - Performing Arts Centres' Award 2001 [Transitional]

Case

[2014] FWCFB 5898

10 SEPTEMBER 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWCFB 5898
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 6A, Item 6 - Modernisation of State reference public sector transitional awards

Entertainment and Broadcasting Industry - Performing Arts Centres' Award 2001 [Transitional]
(AM2014/16)

Live performance industry

VICE PRESIDENT WATSON
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SMITH
COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 10 SEPTEMBER 2014

State reference public sector transitional award modernisation - Entertainment and Broadcasting Industry - Performing Arts Centres' Award 2001 [Transitional] - Whether Award a State reference public sector award - National system employer - Trading corporation - Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 - Sch. 6A Items 2 and 6, Sch. 3 Item 2A, Sch. 5 Item 3 - Fair Work Act 2009 - ss.14, 30D.

[1] This decision arises out of proceedings commenced on the Commission’s own motion under Item 6 of Schedule 6A to the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the Transitional Act) with respect to the Entertainment and Broadcasting Industry - Performing Arts Centres' Award 2001 (the Award).

[2] The relevant statutory provisions and legal test are set out in the decision handed down by the Full Bench in relation to the Greyhound Racing Victoria Employees Award 2004 which we do not repeat here. 1

[3] It is necessary to apply these authorities to the 3 employer respondents to the Award, listed below:

    ● Adelaide Festival Centre Trust
    ● Geelong Performing Arts Centre Trust
    ● Victorian Arts Centre Trust

[4] The Adelaide Festival Centre Trust is not a State reference public sector employer as South Australia has not referred power in relation to public sector employees.

[5] The trading activities of both the Geelong Performing Arts Centre Trust and the Victorian Arts Centre Trust are set out in the witness statement of Stephen Witts, filed in these proceedings. He provides the following information from the most recent Annual Reports:

Geelong Performing Arts Centre Trust

2013-2013 Annual Report

State government recurrent appropriations $0.99m

Other grants from state government entities $0.19m

Operating activities income $2.54m

Fundraising activities income $0.28m

Endowment fund arts for life capital donations $0.09m

Total income from transactions $4.21m

Note 'operating activities' income includes box office sales, venue hire, booking fees, management fees, catering commission and other revenue.

Victorian Arts Centre Trust

2012-2013 Annual Report

Programming $23.46m

Marketing & visitor experience $30.04m

Facilities management $3.35m

Corporate services $0.07m

Investment $1.46m

Government grants $19.03m

Total income from transactions $77.41m

[6] It is clear on the basis of this evidence that the Geelong Performing Arts Centre Trust and Victorian Arts Centre Trust undertake substantial trading activities and are trading corporations within the test established by the relevant authorities. The Adelaide Festival Centre Trust is not a State reference public sector employer. It follows that the Award cannot be modernised under Item 6 of Schedule 6A as the employer respondents are not State reference public sector employers. Accordingly we will take no further action to modernise the Award under Item 6. Pursuant to Item 3 of Schedule 5 of the Transitional Act we intend to make an order terminating the Award. Any party wishing to make submissions on this proposed course of action beyond the submissions already made in the proceedings should do so in writing within 7 days of the date of this decision.

VICE PRESIDENT

Final written submissions:

State of Victoria on 13 May 2014.

 1  [2014] FWCFB 5633.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AT809360  PR554740 >

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

0