Emil Vartazarian v Cool Breeze Clothing Pty Ltd T/A Dimmeys

Case

[2023] FWC 176

20 JANUARY 2023


[2023] FWC 176

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Emil Vartazarian
v

Cool Breeze Clothing Pty Ltd T/A Dimmeys

(U2020/3145)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 20 JANUARY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 17 March 2020 Mr Emil Vartazarian (the Applicant) made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act) alleging he was unfairly dismissed by Cool Breeze Clothing Pty Ltd T/A Dimmeys (the Respondent).

  1. On 28 April 2020 the Commission was made aware that the Respondent had entered external administration. On 26 May 2020 a Decision[1] was issued staying the matter until leave of a Court was granted.

  1. On 6 January 2023 the Commission sent correspondence to Mr Vartazarian’s nominated email address advising him that his matter is at risk of being dismissed as it is apparent he does not intend to seek the leave of the Court. Mr Vartazarian was asked to reply by 12.00 pm 13 January 2023.

  1. The Commission has not received any correspondence from Mr Vartazarian.

  1. Section 587 of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

  1. In the circumstances where leave of the Court is required to proceed, and that leave has not been sought by Mr Vartazarian, I am satisfied that Vartazarian’s application has no reasonable prospects of success.

  1. As such, I order that the application be dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER


[1] [2020] FWC 2596

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR749839>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0