District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elskaf v R [2023] NSWDC 8 Hearing dates: 31 January 2023 Date of orders: 31 January 2023 Decision date: 31 January 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) I set aside the ICOs imposed by the Magistrate.
(3) In lieu thereof I impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 months to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order, commencing today. The standard conditions of the order apply. In addition, the appellant must perform 150 hours of community service.
(4) I confirm the disqualification order made by the Magistrate.
Catchwords: CRIME — Appeal against severity
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act2001
Road Transport Act 2013
Cases Cited: Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ali Elskaf (Appellant)
Rex (Crown)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
D Shridhar (Appellant)
Abbas & Co (Appellant)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
File Number(s): 2020/87365
2020/119813Publication restriction: None
Judgment
Introduction
-
On 2 November 2022 I dismissed the appellant’s conviction appeal against the Magistrate’s finding of guilt for 4 counts of Drive in a Manner or Speed Dangerous to the Public contrary to s 117(2) Road Transport Act 2013: Elskaf v R [2022] NSWDC 525. I will adopt the defined terms that I used in that judgment and this judgment assumes familiarity with my earlier reasons.
-
On 4 April 2022, the Magistrate imposed the penalties set out in the following table.
Date
Term
Disqualification
4 January 2020
15 months imprisonment to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order (ICO) on the standard conditions with 150 hours Community Service Order (CSO)
3 years
5 January 2020
18 months ICO on the standard conditions with 200 hours CSO
3 years
11 March 2020
15 months ICO on the standard conditions with 150 hours CSO
3 years
18 March 2020
2 years ICO on the standard conditions with 300 hours CSO
3 years
-
Each of the ICOs were imposed to run concurrently from the sentence date (4 April 2022), as were the periods of disqualification. The cumulative amount of community service was 800 hours.
-
Each offence was charged as a first offence and accordingly the maximum penalty was 9 months imprisonment and or a fine of $2,200. Each term of imprisonment imposed by the Magistrate exceeded the maximum penalty for the offence. The prosecution conceded this error and agreed that the appeal against severity must be allowed and the appellant resentenced.
-
The Sentencing Assessment Report before the Magistrate provided that the appellant could be offered community service work at the rate of 14 hours per month. I note that it would not have been possible for the appellant to complete the 800 hours of Community Service within the 2 year period of the ICO imposed.
-
A conviction for each offence also carried with it an automatic period of disqualification of 3 years reducible to a minimum period of 12 months. The Magistrate correctly applied s…
Continue reading Elskaf v The King
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Elskaf v The King [2023] NSWDC 8
- Case
- [2023] NSWDC 8
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with examining the proportionality of the ICOs, considering the nature and gravity of the crimes committed, the appellant's personal circumstances, and the rehabilitative potential of the imposed penalties. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the aggregate sentence, including the ICOs, was appropriate given the totality of the appellant's offending and his prospects for rehabilitation.
In its judgment, the Supreme Court found that the original ICOs were indeed too severe. The court noted the appellant's otherwise clean criminal record and his potential for rehabilitation through community service and a structured correctional program. Consequently, the court set aside the original ICOs and imposed a revised sentence of 15 months to be served via a new ICO, supplemented by 150 hours of community service. The court also confirmed the disqualification order previously made by the Magistrate.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Appeal allowed.
(2) I set aside the ICOs imposed by the Magistrate.
(3) In lieu thereof I impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 months to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order, commencing today. The standard conditions of the order apply. In addition, the appellant must perform 150 hours of community service.
(4) I confirm the disqualification order made by the Magistrate.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.