Elskaf v The King

Case [2023] NSWDC 8


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Elskaf v R [2023] NSWDC 8
Hearing dates: 31 January 2023
Date of orders: 31 January 2023
Decision date: 31 January 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

(1)    Appeal allowed.

(2)    I set aside the ICOs imposed by the Magistrate.

(3)    In lieu thereof I impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 months to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order, commencing today. The standard conditions of the order apply. In addition, the appellant must perform 150 hours of community service.

(4)    I confirm the disqualification order made by the Magistrate.   

Catchwords:

CRIME — Appeal against severity

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act2001

Road Transport Act 2013

Cases Cited:

Elskaf v R [2022] NSWDC 525

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Ali Elskaf (Appellant)
Rex (Crown)
Representation:

Counsel:
D Shridhar (Appellant)

Solicitors:
Abbas & Co (Appellant)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
File Number(s): 2020/87365
2020/119813
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

Introduction

  1. On 2 November 2022 I dismissed the appellant’s conviction appeal against the Magistrate’s finding of guilt for 4 counts of Drive in a Manner or Speed Dangerous to the Public contrary to s 117(2) Road Transport Act 2013: Elskaf v R [2022] NSWDC 525. I will adopt the defined terms that I used in that judgment and this judgment assumes familiarity with my earlier reasons.

  2. On 4 April 2022, the Magistrate imposed the penalties set out in the following table.

Date

Term

Disqualification

4 January 2020

15 months imprisonment to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order (ICO) on the standard conditions with 150 hours Community Service Order (CSO)

3 years

5 January 2020

18 months ICO on the standard conditions with 200 hours CSO

3 years

11 March 2020

15 months ICO on the standard conditions with 150 hours CSO

3 years

18 March 2020

2 years ICO on the standard conditions with 300 hours CSO

3 years

  1. Each of the ICOs were imposed to run concurrently from the sentence date (4 April 2022), as were the periods of disqualification. The cumulative amount of community service was 800 hours.

  2. Each offence was charged as a first offence and accordingly the maximum penalty was 9 months imprisonment and or a fine of $2,200. Each term of imprisonment imposed by the Magistrate exceeded the maximum penalty for the offence. The prosecution conceded this error and agreed that the appeal against severity must be allowed and the appellant resentenced.

  3. The Sentencing Assessment Report before the Magistrate provided that the appellant could be offered community service work at the rate of 14 hours per month. I note that it would not have been possible for the appellant to complete the 800 hours of Community Service within the 2 year period of the ICO imposed.

  4. A conviction for each offence also carried with it an automatic period of disqualification of 3 years reducible to a minimum period of 12 months. The Magistrate correctly applied s…

Continue reading Elskaf v The King

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Elskaf v The King [2023] NSWDC 8
Case
[2023] NSWDC 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Elskaf v The King, the appellant, Elskaf, contested the severity of the Intensive Corrections Orders (ICOs) imposed by the Magistrate following his conviction for multiple criminal offences. The appeal was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The primary concern was whether the ICOs were excessively harsh, warranting a reduction in their severity.

The court was tasked with examining the proportionality of the ICOs, considering the nature and gravity of the crimes committed, the appellant's personal circumstances, and the rehabilitative potential of the imposed penalties. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the aggregate sentence, including the ICOs, was appropriate given the totality of the appellant's offending and his prospects for rehabilitation.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court found that the original ICOs were indeed too severe. The court noted the appellant's otherwise clean criminal record and his potential for rehabilitation through community service and a structured correctional program. Consequently, the court set aside the original ICOs and imposed a revised sentence of 15 months to be served via a new ICO, supplemented by 150 hours of community service. The court also confirmed the disqualification order previously made by the Magistrate.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Appeal allowed.

(2) I set aside the ICOs imposed by the Magistrate.

(3) In lieu thereof I impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of 15 months to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order, commencing today. The standard conditions of the order apply. In addition, the appellant must perform 150 hours of community service.

(4) I confirm the disqualification order made by the Magistrate.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.