Elrod & Elrod

Case [2023] FedCFamC1F 889


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1)

Elrod & Elrod [2023] FedCFamC1F 889

File number(s): PAC 3191 of 2019
Judgment of: RIETHMULLER J
Date of judgment: 20 October 2023
Catchwords:  FAMILY LAW - PROPERTY – Interest – Interest payable on late payments – Application of s 117B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) – Calculation of Interest – No matters of principle.
Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79A, 117B

Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) r 10.17

Cases cited:

Perot v Perot [2013] FamCA 137

Stephens & Stephens & Anor (Enforcement) (2009) FLC 93-425; [2009] FamCAFC 240

Division: Division 1 First Instance
Number of paragraphs: 25
Date of last submission/s: 1 October 2023
Date of hearing: 24 July 2023 & 11 August 2023
Place: Parramatta
Counsel for the Applicant: Litigant in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Litigant in person

ORDERS

PAC 3191 of 2019

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MS ELROD

Applicant

AND:

MR ELROD

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

RIETHMULLER J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 OCTOBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The respondent pay the applicant interest in the sum of $13,491.53 within 14 days of the date of these Orders.

Note:   The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RIETHMULLER J:

  1. On 10 October 2022, the parties entered into consent orders resolving their dispute as to the matrimonial property settlement on a final basis.

  2. Order 32 of the Orders made 10 October 2022 provided as follows:

    Cash Payment

    32. The [respondent] shall pay to the [applicant], or as directed by her, the sum of $1,100,000, as follows:

    32.1.    $150,000, within 30 days from the date hereof; and

    32.2.    A further $950,000 within 5 months from the date hereof.

  3. The applicant says that the payments due in accordance with the Orders were made late and seeks interest for the period of the late payments. Two issues arise: firstly, whether any interest should be ordered (and if so at what rate), and secondly, the dates of actual payments which are necessary to calculate interest if it is ordered.

    Whether Interest is Payable

  4. Interest is provided for in s 117B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)…

Continue reading Elrod & Elrod

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Elrod & Elrod [2023] FedCFamC1F 889
Case
[2023] FedCFamC1F 889
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Ms Elrod v Mr Elrod, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) was tasked with determining an application for interest pursuant to section 117B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The applicant sought interest on late payments of property settlement, while the respondent contested the amount of interest claimed. The court was required to assess the application for interest and determine the appropriate amount, if any, that the respondent should pay to the applicant.

The primary legal issue before the court was the calculation and application of interest under section 117B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The court had to determine the correct rate of interest and the period over which it should be applied to the late payments made by the respondent. Additionally, the court needed to consider whether the application met the criteria for an award of interest and whether any objections raised by the respondent were valid.

Riethmuller J, in delivering the decision, found that the application for interest was properly made under section 117B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The court concluded that the applicant was entitled to interest on the late payments in the amount of $13,491.53. The respondent's objections were dismissed as the court found them to be without merit. The judgment was straightforward, with no matters of principle involved.

The court ordered that the respondent pay the applicant interest in the sum of $13,491.53 within 14 days of the date of the order. The form of the order is subject to entry in the Court’s records, and any minor typographical or grammatical errors may be subject to review or variation as per the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Orders

Orders of the court

PAC 3191 of 2019

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MS ELROD

Applicant

AND:

MR ELROD

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

RIETHMULLER J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 OCTOBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The respondent pay the applicant interest in the sum of $13,491.53 within 14 days of the date of these Orders.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.