FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ellison v Sandini Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2018] FCAFC 67
Appeal from: Sandini Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCA 287
Sandini Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2017] FCA 905
File number(s): WAD 172 of 2017
WAD 173 of 2017Judge(s): SIOPIS, LOGAN AND JAGOT JJ Date of judgment: 3 May 2018 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – submissions after the initial judgment as to costs – apportionment as to costs. Date of hearing: Determined on the papers Date of last submissions: 27 April 2018 Registry: Western Australia Division: General Division National Practice Area: Taxation Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 1 Counsel for Ms Ellison: Mr S Owen-Conway QC Solicitor for Ms Ellison: Park Legal Solutions Counsel for the Commissioner of Taxation: Mr J Hmelnitsky SC with Mr D Hume Solicitor for the Commissioner of Taxation: Australian Government Solicitor Counsel for Sandini Pty Ltd: Mr F D O’Loughlin Solicitor for Sandini Pty Ltd: Jackson McDonald
Table of Corrections 9 May 2018 “Counsel for Sandini Pty Ltd: Mr S H P Steward QC with Mr F D O’Loughlin”, has been replaced with: “Counsel for Sandini Pty Ltd: Mr F D O’Loughlin”. ORDERS
WAD 172 of 2017 BETWEEN: DEBBIE MAREE ELLISON
First Appellant
WAVEFRONT ASSET PTY LTD (ACN 139 479 968) ATF THE FELSTEAD FAMILY TRUST
Second Appellant
AND: SANDINI PTY LTD (ACN 008 921 417) ATF THE KARRATHA RIGGING UNIT TRUST
First Respondent
WABELO PTY LTD (ACN 008 921 426) ATF THE ELLISON FAMILY TRUST
Second Respondent
CHRISTOPHER JAMES ELLISON (and others named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
WAD 173 of 2017 BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
First AppellantAND: SANDINI PTY LTD (ACN 008 921 417) ATF THE KARRATHA RIGGING UNIT TRUST
First Respondent
WABELO PTY LTD (ACN 008 921 426) ATF THE ELLISON FAMILY TRUST
Second Respondent
CHRISTOPHER JAMES ELLISON (and others named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
JUDGES:
SIOPIS, LOGAN AND JAGOT JJ
DATE OF ORDER:
3 MAY 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The first to fourth respondents in WAD 173 of 2017 (the Sandini parties) pay the costs of the appeals of the Commissioner of Taxation as agreed or taxed.
2.The Sandini parties pay eighty per cent (80%) of the costs of the appeals of Debbie Maree Ellison and Wavefront Asset Pty Ltd (ACN 139 479 968) ATF The Felstead Family Trust (the Wavefront parties).
3.Order 1 of the orders made on 7 August 2017 be set aside.
4.In lieu of order 1, the Sandini parties pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation and eighty per cent (80%) of the costs of the Wavefront parties in the proceedings below, as agreed or taxed.
5.No order as to costs between the Commissioner of Taxation and the Wavefront parties in the appeals or the proceedings below.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT:
Having regard to the degree of forensic success and failure in respect of the issues which arose for determination on the appeal and the ultimate outcome, the Court considers that, as between the Sandini parties and the Wavefront parties, there ought to be an apportionment of costs both in respect of the appeal and the proceedings below.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Siopis, Logan and Jagot. Associate:
Dated: 3 May 2018
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES
WAD 172 of 2017
Respondents
Fourth Respondent:
ELLISON (WA) PTY LTD (ACN 135 966 773)
Fifth Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
WAD 173 of 2017
Respondents
Fourth Respondent:
ELLISON (WA) PTY LTD (ACN 135 966 773)
Fifth Respondent:
DEBBIE MAREE ELLISON
Sixth Respondent:
WAVEFRONT ASSET PTY LTD (ACN 139 479 968) ATF THE FELSTEAD FAMILY TRUST
- AGLC
- Ellison v Sandini Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2018] FCAFC 67
- Case
- [2018] FCAFC 67
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining the appropriate allocation of costs following an initial judgment. Specifically, the court had to decide on the costs associated with the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Taxation and the Wavefront parties. The Sandini parties contested the costs they were required to pay, arguing for a different apportionment of the expenses incurred during the litigation.
In its decision, the court ruled that the Sandini parties were to bear the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation's appeals as agreed or taxed. Additionally, they were to cover eighty per cent of the costs for the Wavefront parties' appeals. The court also set aside a previous order regarding the costs in the proceedings below and replaced it with a new order that required the Sandini parties to pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation and eighty per cent of the costs of the Wavefront parties in those proceedings. There was no order made regarding the costs between the Commissioner of Taxation and the Wavefront parties, either in the appeals or the proceedings below.
The final orders of the court included the apportionment of costs between the parties, setting aside and replacing an earlier order, and making specific provisions for the payment of costs in the appeals and the proceedings below. The entry of these orders was governed by Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The first to fourth respondents in WAD 173 of 2017 (the Sandini parties) pay the costs of the appeals of the Commissioner of Taxation as agreed or taxed.
2. The Sandini parties pay eighty per cent (80%) of the costs of the appeals of Debbie Maree Ellison and Wavefront Asset Pty Ltd (ACN 139 479 968) ATF The Felstead Family Trust (the Wavefront parties).
3. Order 1 of the orders made on 7 August 2017 be set aside.
4. In lieu of order 1, the Sandini parties pay the costs of the Commissioner of Taxation and eighty per cent (80%) of the costs of the Wavefront parties in the proceedings below, as agreed or taxed.
5. No order as to costs between the Commissioner of Taxation and the Wavefront parties in the appeals or the proceedings below.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.